Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE --skill behavioral-mutation-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SEWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/behavioral-mutation-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/behavioral-mutation-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/behavioral-mutation-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/behavioral-mutation-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/behavioral-mutation-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 286 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.02309 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.01154 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00462 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00231 |
Grade A, and why
behavioral-mutation-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 387 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Behavioral Mutation Analyzer
Overview
This skill systematically analyzes surviving mutants from mutation testing to understand test suite weaknesses and automatically generate improvements. It identifies why mutants survived, categorizes root causes, and produces actionable test enhancements to increase mutation detection rates.
Analysis Workflow
Step 1: Input Collection and Validation
Gather required inputs and verify completeness:
Required Inputs:
- Repository source code (path or files)
- Test suite (test files and framework)
- Mutation testing results (report file or data)
Mutation Result Formats:
- PIT (Java): XML or HTML reports
- Stryker (JavaScript/TypeScript): JSON reports
- mutmut (Python): result files
- Pitest, Infection (PHP), Cosmic Ray, etc.
Validation checklist:
- Source code accessible
- Test suite runnable
- Mutation results parseable
- Mutation tool and version identified
Step 2: Surviving Mutant Extraction
Parse mutation results to identify all surviving mutants:
Extract for each mutant:
- Mutant ID
- Source file and line number
- Mutation operator (e.g., boundary change, negation)
- Original code
- Mutated code
- Status (survived/killed/timeout/error)
Focus on survived mutants: Filter out killed mutants and focus analysis on survivors that indicate test weaknesses.
Step 3: Root Cause Classification
Analyze each surviving mutant to determine why it survived:
Category 1: Insufficient Coverage
Indicators:
- Mutated line not executed by any test
- Mutated method/function never called
- Conditional branch not taken
Analysis:
- Check code coverage data
- Identify uncovered code paths
- Trace execution from test entry points
Example:
// Original
public int calculate(int x) {
if (x > 0) {
return x * 2; // Line 3: Covered
}
return 0; // Line 5: NOT covered
}
// Mutant: Line 5 changed to "return 1;"
// Survives because no test calls calculate() with x <= 0
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 387 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A 039c7923173f
behavioral-mutation-analyzer is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE (251 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 2,309 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
702-technologies-wiremock
Use when you need framework-agnostic WireMock guidance — stub design, JSON or programmatic mappings, precise request matching, response bodies and faults, classpath fixtures, isolation and reset between tests, verification of calls, dynamic ports and base URLs, and avoiding flaky stubs — without choosing Spring Boot…
321-frameworks-spring-boot-testing-unit-tests
Use when you need to write unit tests for Spring Boot applications — including pure unit tests with @ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class) for @Service/@Component, slice tests with @WebMvcTest and @MockitoBean for controllers, @JsonTest for JSON serialization, parameterized tests with @CsvSource/@MethodSource, test…
java-code-review
Review Java code for bugs, duplicate code, correctness risks, maintainability improvements, and missing tests. By default review files modified in git; when the user explicitly names files, classes, packages, or a diff, review that scope instead. Generate a detailed review.md report with actionable comments and fixes.
flake-triage
Decide whether a preview the visual-diff bot flagged actually regressed or is simply nondeterministic, using a repeat-render oracle at a single commit. Use when a PR's preview diff reports a changed preview whose source the PR does not touch, or when a render, GIF or filmstrip is suspected of being unstable.
codex-qa
QA the omo Codex Light edition (lazycodex / packages/omo-codex) itself, in strict isolation so ONLY our plugin is exercised, never the user's real /.codex. The first-party method drives the real codex app-server against an isolated CODEXHOME plus a LOCAL mock model (no real API call), and proves a plugin hook fired by…
refactor-safely
Restructure existing code safely without changing externally observable behavior. Composes context, design, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a characterization-first refactoring workflow. Use when the user says 'refactor this', 'clean this up', 'untangle this module', 'move this to the right…