fuzzing-input-generator

fuzzing-input-generator is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE. It costs 114 tokens per session (4,580 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A tool for generating unusual, invalid, boundary, and random inputs for fuzz testing. Fuzz testing repeatedly exercises code with varied inputs to uncover crashes, bugs, and security weaknesses.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create Python fuzz tests for functions that process strings, numbers, collections, files, JSON, URLs, or other structured data.
Why use it?
It finds edge cases and error-handling problems that ordinary hand-written examples may miss.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is "../../../etc/passwd",.

Good fit Use it to create Python fuzz tests for functions that process strings, numbers, collections, files, JSON, URLs, or other structured data.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/fuzzing-input-generator

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for fuzzing-input-generator

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/fuzzing-input-generator/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/fuzzing-input-generator)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/fuzzing-input-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/fuzzing-input-generator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for fuzzing-input-generator

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/fuzzing-input-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arabelatso/skills-4-se/fuzzing-input-generator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 114 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,580 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 6 findings, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high Privilege Escalation · line 168
    Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.
    Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
  • high Privilege Escalation · line 647
    Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.
    Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
  • high Privilege Escalation · line 649
    Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.
    Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
  • high Privilege Escalation · line 652
    Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.
    Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
  • high Privilege Escalation · line 653
    Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.
    Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
  • high Privilege Escalation · line 655
    Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.
    Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00114 $0.04580
Opus 5 $0.00057 $0.02290
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.00916
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00458

Measured 9d ago against content hash c38f99c7fcc8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

fuzzing-input-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/fuzzing-input-generator/SKILL.md · 719 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 719 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Fuzzing Input Generator

Overview

Generate comprehensive fuzz testing inputs to uncover bugs, crashes, and security vulnerabilities by systematically testing functions with edge cases, invalid inputs, and randomized data.

Workflow

1. Analyze the Target Function

Understand what needs to be fuzzed:

Identify input types:

  • Strings (text, paths, URLs, etc.)
  • Numbers (integers, floats)
  • Booleans
  • Collections (lists, dicts, sets)
  • Structured data (JSON, XML)
  • Files or binary data
  • Combinations of above

Understand expected behavior:

  • What are valid inputs?
  • What should happen with invalid inputs?
  • Are there documented constraints?
  • What error handling exists?

Extract function signature:

def process_user_input(name: str, age: int, email: str) -> dict:
    """Process user registration data."""
    # Analyze: expects string, int, string
    # Constraints: name non-empty, age > 0, email format

2. Select Fuzzing Strategy

Choose appropriate fuzzing approaches:

Edge Case Fuzzing

Test boundary conditions and special values:

  • Empty inputs
  • Very large inputs
  • Minimum/maximum values
  • Zero, negative numbers
  • Special characters
  • Null/None values
Invalid Input Fuzzing

Test with malformed or incorrect data:

  • Wrong types
  • Invalid formats
  • Out-of-range values
  • Malformed structures
  • Encoding issues
Random Valid Fuzzing

Generate random but technically valid inputs:

  • Random strings of various lengths
  • Random numbers in valid ranges
  • Random but well-formed structures
  • Valid but unusual combinations
Security Fuzzing

Test for vulnerabilities:

  • Injection attacks (SQL, command, XSS)
  • Path traversal
  • Buffer overflows
  • Format string attacks
  • Unicode exploits

3. Generate Fuzz Test Code

Create Python test functions with fuzzing inputs.

Basic Template
import pytest
import random
import string

def fuzz_<function_name>():
    """Fuzz test for <function_name>."""

    # Edge cases
    edge_cases = [
        # Add specific edge case inputs
    ]

    # Invalid inputs
    invalid_inputs = [
        # Add invalid inputs
    ]

    # Random valid inputs
    def generate_random_valid():
        # Generate random but valid input
        pass

    # Test edge cases
    for input_data in edge_cases:
        try:
            result = function_under_test(input_data)
            # Check result or at least that it doesn't crash
        except Exception as e:
            # Document or assert expected exceptions
            pass

    # Test invalid inputs
    for input_data in invalid_inputs:
        # Similar testing pattern
        pass

    # Test random inputs
    for _ in range(100):
        random_input = generate_random_valid()
        # Test with random input

Read the full file on GitHub · 719 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 719 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A c38f99c7fcc8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

fuzzing-input-generator is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE (252 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 4,580 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

702-technologies-wiremock

Use when you need framework-agnostic WireMock guidance — stub design, JSON or programmatic mappings, precise request matching, response bodies and faults, classpath fixtures, isolation and reset between tests, verification of calls, dynamic ports and base URLs, and avoiding flaky stubs — without choosing Spring Boot…

jabrena/plinth · 140 tokens

321-frameworks-spring-boot-testing-unit-tests

Use when you need to write unit tests for Spring Boot applications — including pure unit tests with @ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class) for @Service/@Component, slice tests with @WebMvcTest and @MockitoBean for controllers, @JsonTest for JSON serialization, parameterized tests with @CsvSource/@MethodSource, test…

jabrena/plinth · 176 tokens

flake-triage

Decide whether a preview the visual-diff bot flagged actually regressed or is simply nondeterministic, using a repeat-render oracle at a single commit. Use when a PR's preview diff reports a changed preview whose source the PR does not touch, or when a render, GIF or filmstrip is suspected of being unstable.

yschimke/compose-ai-tools · 70 tokens

codex-qa

QA the omo Codex Light edition (lazycodex / packages/omo-codex) itself, in strict isolation so ONLY our plugin is exercised, never the user's real /.codex. The first-party method drives the real codex app-server against an isolated CODEXHOME plus a LOCAL mock model (no real API call), and proves a plugin hook fired by…

code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent · 239 tokens

refactor-safely

Restructure existing code safely without changing externally observable behavior. Composes context, design, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a characterization-first refactoring workflow. Use when the user says 'refactor this', 'clean this up', 'untangle this module', 'move this to the right…

techygarg/lattice · 82 tokens

wio

Testing workflow skill for finding high-value test candidates, writing focused tests, generating realistic workloads, reviewing test value, and diagnosing test-suite health. Use for prompts about what to test next, adding or improving tests, reviewing whether a test is worth keeping, low-signal or flaky tests…

workersio/skills · 86 tokens