Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AratKruglik/claude-sdlc --skill nextjs-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AratKruglik/claude-sdlcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/nextjs-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/nextjs-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/nextjs-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/nextjs-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/nextjs-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 246 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00155 | $0.02499 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00062 | $0.01000 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00500 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00250 |
Grade A, and why
nextjs-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 332 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Next.js Testing Patterns
Next.js testing splits along the same line as the runtime: server-side code runs in Node, client-side in jsdom or a browser. The right tool depends on the layer.
Test framework selection
| Layer | Framework |
|---|---|
| Client Components, hooks, plain JS/TS units | Vitest (preferred for new projects) or Jest |
| Server Components | Playwright integration tests OR Vitest with the right config |
| Server Actions | Vitest (treat the action body as a pure function — extract logic) |
| Route Handlers | Vitest with mocked NextRequest |
| End-to-end (full stack) | Playwright (Vercel-recommended) or Cypress |
For new projects, prefer Vitest + Playwright. Match what exists otherwise.
Vitest setup for Next.js
vitest.config.ts:
import { defineConfig } from 'vitest/config';
import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react';
import path from 'path';
export default defineConfig({
plugins: [react()],
test: {
environment: 'jsdom',
setupFiles: ['./vitest.setup.ts'],
globals: true,
css: true,
},
resolve: {
alias: { '@': path.resolve(__dirname, './') },
},
});
vitest.setup.ts:
import '@testing-library/jest-dom/vitest';
Install: pnpm add -D vitest @vitejs/plugin-react jsdom @testing-library/react @testing-library/jest-dom @testing-library/user-event.
Testing Client Components (RTL)
// app/users/_components/UserFilter.test.tsx
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event';
import { UserFilter } from './UserFilter';
describe('UserFilter', () => {
it('calls onChange as user types', async () => {
const onChange = vi.fn();
const user = userEvent.setup();
render(<UserFilter onChange={onChange} />);
await user.type(screen.getByRole('textbox'), 'alice');
expect(onChange).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith('alice');
});
});
Query priority: getByRole > getByLabelText > getByText > getByTestId (last resort). Roles match how assistive tech sees the UI.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 097a34dcc5f9
- 1mo ago First seen · 330 lines · 155 tokens per session scan A d8782524091b
nextjs-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository AratKruglik/claude-sdlc (53 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 155 tokens to every session and 2,499 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify-omnigent
Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs.…
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
eval-dataset-design
A guide to creating reliable test sets for AI agents. Each evaluation task includes the request, the simulated user's behaviour, a reset starting state, and a success check that can be independently verified.
dogfood
Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
test-warp-ui
Guides testing Warp UI features and changes using the computer use tool. Use this skill only when computer-use testing was requested (explicit request or accepted offer) and the computeruse tool is available to the agent. Covers launching Warp and verifying UI behavior.