Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/arbazkhan971/godmode/e2enpx skills add arbazkhan971/godmode --skill e2egit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arbazkhan971/godmodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbazkhan971/godmode/e2e)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbazkhan971/godmode/e2e"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbazkhan971/godmode/e2e.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.01726 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00863 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00345 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
e2e scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 222 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
E2E — End-to-End Testing
Activate When
- User invokes
/godmode:e2e - User says "end to end", "end-to-end", "e2e test", "user flow test", "checkout flow"
- User says "E2E test", "browser test", "integration test"
- User asks about Playwright, Cypress, or Selenium
- User needs to fix flaky E2E tests
- Ship skill needs user-flow validation
Workflow
Step 1: Assess E2E Test State
# Find existing E2E tests
find . -name "*.e2e.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" \
| grep -i -E "e2e|playwright|cypress" \
| grep -v node_modules
# Check for test framework config
ls playwright.config.* cypress.config.* wdio.conf.* \
2>/dev/null
# Count existing test files
find e2e/ tests/ -name "*.spec.ts" 2>/dev/null | wc -l
E2E TEST STATE:
Framework: <Playwright | Cypress | Selenium | none>
Config file: <path or none>
Test count: <N>
Page objects: <N> (or none)
Flaky tests: <N known flaky | unknown>
IF test count == 0: scaffold from scratch
IF test count > 0 AND flaky > 3: prioritize remediation
IF framework == none: default to Playwright
Step 2: Design Test Architecture
e2e/
├── tests/ # By feature
│ ├── auth/
│ │ ├── login.spec.ts
│ │ └── registration.spec.ts
│ ├── checkout/
│ │ ├── cart.spec.ts
│ │ └── payment.spec.ts
│ └── dashboard/
│ └── navigation.spec.ts
├── pages/ # Page Object Models
│ ├── base.page.ts
│ ├── login.page.ts
│ └── dashboard.page.ts
└── fixtures/
└── test-data.ts
Step 3: Page Object Model
All locators live in page objects. Tests call methods only.
Step 4: Write E2E Tests
Simulate real user journeys (login, add to cart, checkout), not individual page checks.
Step 5: Flakiness Remediation
FLAKINESS DIAGNOSIS:
| Symptom | Fix |
|----------------------|------------------------------|
| Element not found | Use auto-waiting locators |
| Timeout on nav | waitForLoadState, bump limit |
| Stale element ref | Re-query after action |
| Test order deps | Isolate data in beforeEach |
ANTI-FLAKINESS RULES:
- Never use fixed sleep — use auto-waiting assertions
- Never depend on execution order — independent tests
- Never use CSS selectors — use data-testid, roles
- Always seed test data via API, not through the UI
- Always retry failed tests in CI (investigate repeats)
- Always record traces/screenshots on failure
THRESHOLDS:
Pass rate target: 100% over 10 consecutive runs
Max flaky tolerance: 0 (zero flaky tests in suite)
Retry budget in CI: 2 retries per test max
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 222 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 0db543355925
e2e is a skill published in the GitHub repository arbazkhan971/godmode (26 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 1,726 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
solopi-ai
通过 SoloPi 的机器可读 CLI 编译和执行 AI 验证计划,管理签名端侧 ExecuTorch 决策模型、持久设备池、无人值守任务、安卓设备、应用、动作、配置、用例步骤与交互录制、回放及性能历史、动态 Agent、批量与重复执行、性能监控、压力测试和证据。适用于需求/AC 到 Result Judge 三态结论、cloud/on-device 决策切换、模型发布门禁,以及 generation 租约的多设备 CI 执行。.
asc-shots-pipeline
Orchestrate iOS screenshot automation with xcodebuild/simctl for build-run, AXe for UI actions, JSON settings and plan files, Koubou-based framing (asc screenshots frame), and screenshot upload (asc screenshots upload). Use when users ask for automated screenshot capture, AXe-driven simulator flows, frame composition…
e2e-testing
Playwright-based end-to-end testing workflow.
reality-verification
This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify a fix", "reproduce failure", "diagnose issue", "check BEFORE/AFTER state", "VF task", "reality check", "check test quality", "mock-only tests", or needs guidance on verifying fixes by reproducing failures before and after implementation, or detecting mock-heavy…
a11y-playwright-testing
Accessibility testing for web applications using Playwright (@playwright/test), TypeScript, and axe-core. Use to write, run, or debug WCAG 2.2 AA checks, keyboard and focus tests, ARIA/semantic validation, accessible names, form labels, color contrast, or screen-reader test patterns. Keywords: accessibility, WCAG…
accessibility-selenium-testing
Accessibility testing toolkit using Selenium WebDriver 4+ with Java 21+ and axe-core engine. Use when asked to validate WCAG 2.2 AA compliance, scan pages or components for a11y violations, test keyboard navigation, audit color contrast, check ARIA semantics, generate accessibility reports, filter axe rules, debug…