Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents --skill accessibility-selenium-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/accessibility-selenium-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/accessibility-selenium-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/accessibility-selenium-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/accessibility-selenium-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents/accessibility-selenium-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.02475 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01238 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00495 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00248 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-selenium-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 246 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accessibility Testing with Selenium WebDriver & Axe Core
This skill enables automated accessibility analysis within the Selenium WebDriver framework using the axe-core engine to detect WCAG violations and best practice issues directly in the browser.
Activation: This skill is triggered when you need to validate WCAG compliance, scan for accessibility violations, test keyboard navigation, audit ARIA semantics, or generate a11y reports.
First Questions to Ask
- What app URL(s) or user flows are in scope (and what is explicitly out of scope)?
- Is there an existing Selenium setup and how is CI run?
- Which standard is the target (WCAG 2.2 AA by default), and are there org-specific policies?
- Which pages/components are highest risk (auth, checkout, forms, modals, navigation)?
- Are there known constraints (legacy markup, third-party widgets) that require exceptions?
Prerequisites
| Component | Version | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Java JDK | 21+ | Runtime with modern features |
| Maven | 3.9+ | Dependency management |
| Selenium WebDriver | 4.x | Browser automation |
| axe-core-selenium | 4.10+ | Deque axe-core integration |
| JUnit 5 | 5.10+ | Test framework |
| AssertJ | 3.x | Fluent assertions for readable failures |
| Allure | 2.x | Reporting with a11y violation attachments |
Note: Use
com.deque.html.axe-core:seleniumMaven dependency for axe integration.
Target: WCAG 2.2 AA (
wcag2a,wcag2aa,wcag21a,wcag21aa,wcag22a,wcag22aa). See WCAG 2.2 spec.
Do NOT Use For
- Playwright/TypeScript accessibility testing (use
a11y-playwright-testing). - Authoring Selenium functional UI tests (use
webapp-selenium-testing). - Full conformance sign-off — automated axe scans catch ~30-50% of issues; manual audit + assistive-tech testing is still required.
Axe-Core Tools Reference
AxeBuilder Configuration
| Method | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
new AxeBuilder() |
Create scanner instance | Entry point |
.withTags(List<String>) |
Filter by WCAG tags | wcag2aa, wcag21aa, wcag22aa |
.include(String) |
Scan specific selector | #main-content |
.exclude(String) |
Skip selector from scan | .third-party-widget |
.disableRules(List<String>) |
Disable specific rules | color-contrast |
.withRules(List<String>) |
Run only specific rules | label, button-name |
.analyze(WebDriver) |
Execute the scan | Returns Results |
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- LICENSE.txt 1.0 KB
- references/axe-api-reference.md 1.4 KB
- references/axe-patterns-helper-processing.md 8.9 KB
- references/axe-patterns-helper-scanning.md 8.0 KB
- references/axe-patterns-keyboard-and-cicd.md 4.2 KB
- references/axe-patterns-tags-and-tests.md 3.3 KB
- references/code-patterns.md 4.9 KB
- references/wcag21aa-checklist-additions-exceptions.md 2.6 KB
- references/wcag21aa-checklist-perceivable-operable.md 7.0 KB
- references/wcag21aa-checklist-understandable-robust.md 3.8 KB
- scripts/AccessibilityHelper.java 20 KB
- scripts/pom-template.xml 9.6 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 246 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A b9f3fbfb8b21
accessibility-selenium-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository fugazi/test-automation-skills-agents (234 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 2,475 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
screen-reader-testing
Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS. Use when validating screen reader compatibility, debugging accessibility issues, or ensuring assistive technology support.
testing-e2e
End-to-end testing patterns with Playwright — page objects, AI agent testing, visual regression, accessibility testing with axe-core, and CI integration. Use when writing E2E tests, setting up Playwright, implementing visual regression, or testing accessibility.
design-ship
One-shot pipeline turning a claude.ai/design link into a pull request: scaffold via /ork:design-import, stories and specs via /ork:cover, browser verification via /ork:expect, then open the PR. Use when a design link should come back as a PR with no intermediate steps; if all you need is the components written to…
api-integration-test
Create, maintain, and run gated Go integration tests for internal APIs and service-to-service clients (HTTP/gRPC). Use for endpoint verification, contract checks with real runtime config, opt-in execution, timeout/retry safety, and integration failure triage in Go services.
e2e-test
Design, maintain, and execute reliable end-to-end tests for critical user journeys with Agent Browser as first choice for exploration and Playwright as the preferred code path for suites and CI. Use for E2E strategy, journey coverage, flaky test triage, artifact collection, CI gating, regression prevention, and…
hr-qa
Help HR managers, recruiters, and talent acquisition teams understand Quality Assurance (QA), Software Testing, Test Automation, and modern Quality Engineering concepts. Use when asked to explain QA testing, screen QA candidates, understand automation testing, compare manual QA and SDET, evaluate QA skills, create QA…