Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/johnqtcg/awesome-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/api-integration-testWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/api-integration-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/api-integration-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/api-integration-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/api-integration-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/api-integration-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 256 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.05976 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.02390 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00598 |
Grade A, and why
api-integration-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 476 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
API Integration Test
Goal
Build production-representative, opt-in integration tests for internal APIs with strict safety controls, reproducible execution, and clear failure diagnosis.
When To Use
Trigger this skill when the user asks for:
- Internal API integration tests (HTTP or gRPC)
- Service-to-service adapter tests requiring real runtime config
- Internal endpoint contract verification against real responses
- Integration test failure triage or debugging
Scope
Use this skill for:
- Internal HTTP API integration tests.
- Internal gRPC client/server integration tests.
- Service-to-service adapter tests requiring real runtime config.
- Internal endpoint contract verification against real responses.
Do not use this skill for:
- Pure unit tests with heavy mocks — use
$unit-test. - Full end-to-end browser journeys.
- Third-party vendor API tests — use
$thirdparty-api-integration-test.
Mandatory Gates
Gates execute in strict serial order. Any gate failure blocks all subsequent steps.
1) Scope 2) Go Version 3) Config 4) Mode
Validation ──→ Gate ──→ Completeness ──→ Selection
│ │ │ │
out of scope? read go.mod Full/Scaffold/ auto-select
→ stop+redirect → adapt Blocked? Smoke/Std/Comp
Blocked → STOP
│ │ │ │
5) Production 6) Execution 7) Reference
Safety ──→ Integrity ──→ Loading
│ │ │
prod? env+host actually ran? load by trigger
→ t.Fatalf → report pattern
1) Scope Validation Gate
Confirm the task falls within this skill's scope:
- Internal HTTP or gRPC API → proceed
- Pure unit test → redirect to
$unit-test, STOP - Third-party vendor API → redirect to
$thirdparty-api-integration-test, STOP - Full end-to-end browser journey → out of scope, inform user, STOP
What ships with it
28 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/advanced-patterns.md 5.8 KB
- references/checklists.md 4.5 KB
- references/common-integration-gate.md 6.1 KB
- references/common-output-contract.md 2.1 KB
- references/internal-api-patterns.md 6.3 KB
- scripts/run_integration.sh 2.8 KB runs code
- scripts/run_regression.sh 644 B runs code
- scripts/tests/COVERAGE.md 9.9 KB
- scripts/tests/golden/001_simple_http_get.json 349 B
- scripts/tests/golden/002_grpc_service.json 324 B
- scripts/tests/golden/003_retryable_endpoint.json 298 B
- scripts/tests/golden/004_production_safety.json 260 B
- scripts/tests/golden/005_missing_config_degradation.json 275 B
- scripts/tests/golden/006_ci_github_actions.json 308 B
- scripts/tests/golden/007_expected_failure_paths.json 296 B
- scripts/tests/golden/008_data_lifecycle.json 221 B
- scripts/tests/llm_eval/pure_normalizer/bad.md 1.2 KB
- scripts/tests/llm_eval/pure_normalizer/good.md 1.4 KB
- scripts/tests/llm_eval/pure_normalizer/meta.json 1.3 KB
- scripts/tests/llm_eval/pure_normalizer/sut.go 779 B
- scripts/tests/llm_eval/user_profile_http/bad.md 3.6 KB
- scripts/tests/llm_eval/user_profile_http/good.md 9.3 KB
- scripts/tests/llm_eval/user_profile_http/meta.json 6.7 KB
- scripts/tests/llm_eval/user_profile_http/sut.go 2.0 KB
- scripts/tests/test_behavioral_integration.py 20 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/test_golden_scenarios.py 7.5 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/test_llm_skill_eval.py 20 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/test_skill_contract.py 43 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +23 lines 90c3cd0c3db6
- 1mo ago First seen · 453 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 34d5afbbf00f
api-integration-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository johnqtcg/awesome-skills (30 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 5,976 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
webapp-testing
Write and run comprehensive web app tests — unit, integration, E2E with Playwright/Cypress, and visual regression.
a11y-playwright-testing
Accessibility testing for web applications using Playwright (@playwright/test), TypeScript, and axe-core. Use to write, run, or debug WCAG 2.2 AA checks, keyboard and focus tests, ARIA/semantic validation, accessible names, form labels, color contrast, or screen-reader test patterns. Keywords: accessibility, WCAG…
accessibility-selenium-testing
Accessibility testing toolkit using Selenium WebDriver 4+ with Java 21+ and axe-core engine. Use when asked to validate WCAG 2.2 AA compliance, scan pages or components for a11y violations, test keyboard navigation, audit color contrast, check ARIA semantics, generate accessibility reports, filter axe rules, debug…
webapp-selenium-testing
Author and maintain versioned Selenium WebDriver tests with Java and JUnit 5. Use for creating, debugging, or running Selenium specs, implementing Page Objects, handling explicit waits, capturing screenshots, or setting up Maven test projects. Supports Chrome, Firefox, and Edge. Keywords: Selenium WebDriver, Java…
verify-implementation
A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.
verification-engine
Use when verifying build/test/lint before commit, PR, or completion claims. Runs verification pipeline in fresh subagent context with auto-repair. Triggers on /handoff-verify, pre-commit check, build verification, test validation.