Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arbiterForge/codeArbiter --skill ca-commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arbiterForge/codeArbiterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/ca-commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.05403 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.02161 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00540 |
Grade A, and why
ca-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +35 lines 2616cfabede7
- 6d ago Changed · +42 lines 185e57d19674
- 14d ago Changed · +2 lines 5ddf265140bd
- 24d ago Changed · +154 lines · +26 tokens per session 2aa5b9a53e6f
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines ed360cb33e6f
- 1mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 98749b484191
ca-commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository arbiterForge/codeArbiter (149 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 5,403 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
scope-check
Use before committing changes to verify no scope creep has occurred. Triggers when about to run git commit, when reviewing changes with git diff, when the diff touches files unrelated to the original task, or when more than 5 files have been modified. Also use when the user says "check scope", "did I go off track", or…
chinese-commit-conventions
A Chinese-language guide to Conventional Commits, a format for writing consistent Git commit messages, plus related changelog, commit-checking, and commit-helper configuration.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
run-work
Execute a work unit end-to-end: sequence tasks by dependency, implement, test between tasks, commit, and track progress. Use to deliver a complete feature in one session. Invoked as /agiflow:run-work . Uses getworkunit, listtasks, updatetask, getworkunitprogress.
atmos-git
Atmos Git and GitOps: git.repositories, clone/pull/status/diff/commit/push/clean, local Git hook shims and hook env vars, signed commits, managed workdirs, fork-PR trust gate (clone gate and posting gate), and auth via identities or github/sts.