Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arbiterForge/codeArbiter --skill tribunalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arbiterForge/codeArbiterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/tribunal)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/tribunal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/tribunal/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/tribunal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arbiterforge/codearbiter/tribunal.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.03332 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.01333 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00666 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00333 |
Grade A, and why
tribunal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
23 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/ai-markers.md 395 B
- references/cost-and-models.md 4.0 KB
- references/finding-record.md 5.3 KB
- references/issue-filing.md 3.7 KB
- references/lenses/appsec.md 3.1 KB
- references/lenses/architecture.md 3.0 KB
- references/lenses/change-closure.md 3.3 KB
- references/lenses/coverage.md 3.0 KB
- references/lenses/infra.md 3.1 KB
- references/lenses/migration.md 3.0 KB
- references/lenses/observability.md 2.9 KB
- references/lenses/performance.md 3.0 KB
- references/lenses/reliability.md 3.1 KB
- references/lenses/secrets-supply.md 3.3 KB
- references/lenses/semantic-contract.md 3.0 KB
- references/lenses/test-fidelity.md 2.8 KB
- references/lenses/typesafety.md 2.9 KB
- references/report.md 2.6 KB
- references/review-risk.md 4.5 KB
- references/schemas.md 15 KB
- references/telemetry.md 5.6 KB
- references/triage.md 5.3 KB
- references/verification-quality.md 3.5 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · +93 lines fe475c12cca3
- 22d ago Changed · +14 lines · -57 tokens per session 13ada56f30d1
- 1mo ago First seen · 112 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 64fa763953a5
tribunal is a skill published in the GitHub repository arbiterForge/codeArbiter (149 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 3,332 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
blast-radius
Project-grounded blast-radius tracing for code changes, PRs, diffs, files, symbols, or bugfixes, especially in Helpdesk-style repos. Use before editing, committing, merging, or reviewing when downstream callers, tests, routes, SQL, configs, schema, auth/tenant boundaries, external integrations, sibling bugs, or…
enterprise-pr-review
End-to-end PR conversation closer and advisory review harvester for enterprise work. Use this whenever the user mentions unresolved PR conversations, Copilot/GitHub review comments, a PR that cannot merge, skipped/non-blocking Copilot feedback, a failed PR review, or asks to address/resolve/learn from PR feedback. It…
hardening-gate
Standards-enforcement gate that runs BEFORE implementation. Takes a plan, TDD, or fix proposal and hard-blocks it if SRP, seam, ownership, blast radius, edge cases, or root-cause reasoning are missing. Emits a hardening-report.md that downstream skills (enterprise-plan, enterprise-contract, patch-or-fix, b-deep-debug)…
enterprise-review
Use when enterprise implementation is complete enough for a structured review that separates spec compliance from code quality and classifies drift explicitly.
daily-domain-refactor-runner
Use when inspecting Helpdesk domains for SRP, README, write-boundary, table ownership, or service-migration opportunities and when running one selected domain refactor lane through enterprise gates, PR audits, review loops, and explicit dev merge authorization.
helpdesk-quality-gates
Apply final Claude/Codex consensus quality gates for Helpdesk PRs, goals, skills, and workflows before claiming ready, green, done, merge-ready, or workflow-complete.