Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arc-mcp/arc-1 --skill sap-transport-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arc-mcp/arc-1Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arc-mcp/arc-1/sap-transport-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arc-mcp/arc-1/sap-transport-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arc-mcp/arc-1/sap-transport-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arc-mcp/arc-1/sap-transport-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arc-mcp/arc-1/sap-transport-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00113 | $0.03462 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.01731 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00692 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00346 |
Grade A, and why
sap-transport-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 209 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SAP Transport / Change Review
Answer "what actually changed?" for a transport or for your in-flight (unactivated) work, as a reviewable report: a per-object unified diff plus risk flags — not a wall of full source.
It leans on two token-cheap ARC-1 primitives so a review of a 30-object transport costs a handful of small diffs instead of 60 full-source reads:
SAPTransport(action="list", summary=true)— scan many open transports cheaply (objects omitted,objectCountkept), then drill into one.SAPRead(action="diff", from=…, to=…)— server-side unified diff per object; the response is just the hunks.
Complements explain-abap-code (deep single-object understanding) and sap-object-documenter (written docs for a package). This skill is about delta — what moved between two points in time — for code review, hand-off, or a pre-release gate.
Pick the mode (who's asking)
| You are… | Scope | What the skill does |
|---|---|---|
| Reviewing a transport (senior dev / approver) | one transport id | Diff every safely resolved source object, label the version coverage, and add impact/quality checks only when requested or risk-triggered. The chat / whole-transport twin of Eclipse ADT 3.6's "Object Changes" tab (same source-diff coverage boundary). |
| Checking your own recent work (dev) | your modifiable transports | "What have I changed since my last release?" — diff each object's last-released version → current. Light: skip impact/ATC unless asked. |
For a system-wide inventory of every open transport (basis: who has what open, how big, conflicts — no diffs) that's a different job → sap-transport-overview.
Smart Defaults (apply silently, do NOT ask)
| Setting | Default | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Transport scope | current user, modifiable (status="D") |
The work in progress, not released history |
| Overview first | summary=true when listing |
Cheap scan before pulling any object list in full |
| Diff direction (in-flight) | from="active", to="inactive" |
Exact for pending, unactivated source only; it does not reconstruct changes already activated in an open request |
| Diffable types | PROG, CLAS, INTF, FUNC, FUGR, INCL, DDLS, DCLS, BDEF, SRVD, DDLX, TABL | The plain-text source types action="diff" supports |
| Object-diff cap | ~40 | Above that, summarize counts and ask which to expand |
| Impact | On for changed CDS/RAP objects in a risk-focused review; otherwise opt-in | Focus the extra reads where dependency risk exists |
| ATC | Opt-in (+atc) or clearly risk-triggered; bounded to changed objects |
ATC is workload-producing and must not fan out silently across a large request |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 209 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A 4ff749756df7
sap-transport-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository arc-mcp/arc-1 (191 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 3,462 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…