gitnexus-impact-analysis

gitnexus-impact-analysis is a skill for Claude Code from Arenukvern/mcp_flutter. It costs 50 tokens per session (755 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of gitnexus-impact-analysis, MIT.

A code-dependency map that shows which parts of a software project use a file, function, or module. It also traces the application flows affected by a change.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to find direct and indirect callers or importers, inspect affected execution flows, and review current Git changes. It is useful when changing shared code or checking whether a planned edit is safe.
Why use it?
It helps predict what may break before code is edited or committed. This gives developers a clearer view of the change's blast radius instead of relying only on guesswork.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Use it to find direct and indirect callers or importers, inspect affected execution flows, and review current Git changes. It is useful when changing shared code or checking whether a planned edit is safe.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/arenukvern/mcp_flutter/gitnexus-impact-analysis
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Arenukvern/mcp_flutter --skill gitnexus-impact-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Arenukvern/mcp_flutter

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gitnexus-impact-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arenukvern/mcp_flutter/gitnexus-impact-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arenukvern/mcp_flutter/gitnexus-impact-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arenukvern/mcp_flutter/gitnexus-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arenukvern/mcp_flutter/gitnexus-impact-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gitnexus-impact-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arenukvern/mcp_flutter/gitnexus-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arenukvern/mcp_flutter/gitnexus-impact-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 50 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 755 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00050 $0.00755
Opus 5.5 $0.00020 $0.00302
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00151
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00076

Measured 28d ago against content hash 09e529505da1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gitnexus-impact-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 28d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to gitnexus-impact-analysis — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-impact-analysis/SKILL.md · 98 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Impact Analysis with GitNexus

When to Use

  • "Is it safe to change this function?"
  • "What will break if I modify X?"
  • "Show me the blast radius"
  • "Who uses this code?"
  • Before making non-trivial code changes
  • Before committing — to understand what your changes affect

Workflow

1. impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"})  → What depends on this
2. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/processes                   → Check affected execution flows
3. detect_changes()                               → Map current git changes to affected flows
4. Assess risk and report to user

If "Index is stale" → run node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyze in terminal.

Checklist

- [ ] impact({target, direction: "upstream"}) to find dependents
- [ ] Review d=1 items first (these WILL BREAK)
- [ ] Check high-confidence (>0.8) dependencies
- [ ] READ processes to check affected execution flows
- [ ] detect_changes() for pre-commit check
- [ ] Assess risk level and report to user

Understanding Output

Depth Risk Level Meaning
d=1 WILL BREAK Direct callers/importers
d=2 LIKELY AFFECTED Indirect dependencies
d=3 MAY NEED TESTING Transitive effects

Risk Assessment

Affected Risk
<5 symbols, few processes LOW
5-15 symbols, 2-5 processes MEDIUM
>15 symbols or many processes HIGH
Critical path (auth, payments) CRITICAL

Tools

impact — the primary tool for symbol blast radius:

impact({
  target: "validateUser",
  direction: "upstream",
  minConfidence: 0.8,
  maxDepth: 3
})

→ d=1 (WILL BREAK):
  - loginHandler (src/auth/login.ts:42) [CALLS, 100%]
  - apiMiddleware (src/api/middleware.ts:15) [CALLS, 100%]

→ d=2 (LIKELY AFFECTED):
  - authRouter (src/routes/auth.ts:22) [CALLS, 95%]

detect_changes — git-diff based impact analysis:

Read the full file on GitHub · 98 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 28d ago Changed 09e529505da1
  2. 2mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A a4d6e8003c4a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gitnexus-impact-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository Arenukvern/mcp_flutter (394 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 755 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to gitnexus-impact-analysis, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

code-review

Use when asked to review a PR, MR, branch, or diff, audit changed files, or check code quality.

evanca/flutter-ai-rules · 27 tokens

security-review

Review authorized application code, configuration, designs or artifacts for concrete authorization, data exposure, injection, secret, dependency and LLM/tool security risks. Use for a requested security review or a change affecting a trust boundary.

sgaabdu4/building-flutter-apps · 46 tokens

code-review

Review PR, branch, commit or working-tree changes for concrete defects and fidelity to intended behavior. Also use when explicitly asked to independently challenge a prepared plan, diagnosis or verification claim.

sgaabdu4/building-flutter-apps · 39 tokens

fl-reviewer

Reviews UI-layer changes — screens, blocs, widgets, routes — against the template's StateBase + CoreBlocBase + fltheme conventions.

phanbaohuy96/flutter_base_structure · 31 tokens

fl-data-reviewer

Reviews data-layer changes — Freezed DTOs, Retrofit clients, the storage seam, optional hivece stores, and repositories — against the template's conventions.

phanbaohuy96/flutter_base_structure · 35 tokens

flutter-review

Flutter & Dart Code Review: Expert review of Flutter applications focusing on widget architecture, state management, Dart best practices, performance, and platform-specific considerations. Use whenever the user wants a review of Flutter/Dart code, widget design, state management patterns, or mentions Flutter, Dart…

camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit · 99 tokens