Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aristoteleo/PantheonOS --skill writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aristoteleo/PantheonOSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aristoteleo/pantheonos/writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aristoteleo/pantheonos/writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aristoteleo/pantheonos/writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aristoteleo/pantheonos/writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aristoteleo/pantheonos/writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.00939 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00469 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00188 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
Evidence-Bound Section Drafting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evidence-Bound Section Drafting
Use only after triage, outline, and evidence boundaries exist (see ../workflow/SKILL.md and ../SKILL.md).
Drafting Rules
- Write
draft/paper.mdas the content source of truth. - Keep each core claim within
claim_evidence_map.md. - Use
missingevidence to ask for material, downgrade, or remove claims. - Do not invent data, citations, mechanisms, reviewer changes, or availability statements.
- For major rewrites, shape from raw material to candidate openings to paragraph-by-paragraph structure before polishing.
Section Roles (quick reference)
| Section | Role | Quality gate |
|---|---|---|
| Title | searchable, precise, not inflated | no vague clever title |
| Abstract | problem, gap, method, key result, meaning | no result-free impact claim |
| Introduction | known → gap → insufficiency → approach → contribution | gap and contribution align |
| Related work | themed positioning | not chronological paper dump |
| Methods | reproducible protocol | data/software/parameters/statistics clear |
| Results | question → method → observation → quantitative result → interpretation | each result points to figure/table/data |
| Discussion | finding, relation to literature, mechanism, limits, future | no new data |
| Limitations | honest boundary and risk | no hidden fatal flaw |
| Conclusion | contribution and boundary | not abstract repetition |
Section-Specific Skills
Read the corresponding skill file before drafting each section.
| Section | File | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Abstract | abstract.md | Three proven templates (Challenge→Contribution, Challenge→Insight→Contribution, Multiple Contributions); 150–250 words; no citations |
| Introduction | introduction.md | Logic Map: Task → Challenge → Solution → Advantage; backward writing |
| Methods | method.md | Reproducibility checklist: software versions, parameters, hardware, data/code statements |
| Results | results.md | Each subsection ≥1 figure/table reference; claim → evidence; present tense |
| Discussion | discussion.md | Four-part structure: Interpretation → Comparison → Limitations → Future |
| Response Letter | response_letter.md | Reviewer-comment-to-response unit format |
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 84 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 5e870c3576bc
Evidence-Bound Section Drafting is a skill published in the GitHub repository aristoteleo/PantheonOS (484 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed BSD-2-Clause. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 939 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ensembl-database
Query Ensembl genome database REST API for 250+ species. Gene lookups, sequence retrieval, variant analysis, comparative genomics, orthologs, VEP predictions, for genomic research.
aatmf-t10-confidentiality-breach
AATMF T10 — Integrity & Confidentiality Breach. System prompt extraction, training-data extraction, model-weight leakage, private-key recovery.
mochi-remind
Handle due reminders — notify the user with natural language and mark them done.
memory
Use when the user asks to remember, recall, forget, update, search, or inspect durable OpenSquilla memory, including profile facts in USER.md and long-term notes in MEMORY.md or memory//.md.
sidewinder-rattlesnake
Adversary-emulation profile for SideWinder (G0121 / Rattlesnake / T-APT-04 / Razor Tiger), India's suspected state-sponsored cyber-espionage actor.
lazarus-group
Adversary-emulation profile for Lazarus Group (G0032, aka Hidden Cobra / Diamond Sleet / Labyrinth Chollima), a North Korean RGB-linked actor conducting espionage, destructive, and financially motivated operations.