Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Arize-ai/phoenix. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Arize-ai/phoenix/main/.agents/skills/phoenix-evals-new-metric/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Arize-ai/phoenixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arize-ai/phoenix/phoenix-evals-new-metric)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arize-ai/phoenix/phoenix-evals-new-metric"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arize-ai/phoenix/phoenix-evals-new-metric/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arize-ai/phoenix/phoenix-evals-new-metric"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arize-ai/phoenix/phoenix-evals-new-metric.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Rogue Agent · line 188 Skill modifies its own code, configuration, or behavior at runtime. Self-modification enables an agent to escalate privileges, disable safety constraints, or install persistent backdoors.Fix: Prevent the skill from modifying its own code, SKILL.md, or configuration files. Treat skill files as read-only at runtime.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.02140 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01070 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00428 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00214 |
Grade A, and why
phoenix-evals-new-metric scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 189 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 857270b89292
phoenix-evals-new-metric is a skill published in the GitHub repository Arize-ai/phoenix (11,404 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 2,140 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
trulens-evaluation-setup
Configure feedback functions and selectors for TruLens evaluations.
trulens-instrumentation
Instrument LLM apps with TruLens OTEL-based tracing - from setup to debugging and optimization.
trulens-notebook-execution
Execute and display Jupyter notebooks for TruLens demos and quickstarts.
trulens-evaluation-workflow
Systematically evaluate your LLM application with TruLens.
trulens-blocking-guardrails
Configure and use feedback functions as runtime blocking guardrails.
trulens-dataset-curation
Create and curate evaluation datasets with ground truth for TruLens.