Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Arnosdeus/agent-toolkit --skill accessibility-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Arnosdeus/agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arnosdeus/agent-toolkit/accessibility-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arnosdeus/agent-toolkit/accessibility-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arnosdeus/agent-toolkit/accessibility-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arnosdeus/agent-toolkit/accessibility-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arnosdeus/agent-toolkit/accessibility-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00188 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00075 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Accessibility Review
Procedure and output
Test keyboard paths, focus order, accessible names, and important states before
reviewing markup. Report BLOCKER, MAJOR, MINOR, or NOTE findings with
file:line — user impact — evidence — fix; distinguish automated results from
manual screen-reader verification.
Check keyboard navigation, focus visibility and management, semantic HTML, labels, field errors, ARIA correctness, contrast, accessible names, screen-reader behavior, reduced motion, target sizes, dialogs, tables, and navigation. Prefer native semantics over ARIA. Use Playwright and the accessibility tree where practical, and distinguish observed issues from items requiring assistive-tech or manual verification.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A bbebc445236c
accessibility-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Arnosdeus/agent-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 188 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ui-web
Web UI - glassmorphism, Tailwind, dark mode, accessibility.
frontend-ui-ux-system
A company-level guide for designing web interfaces and user experiences. It covers visual styles, design tokens (named values for colors, spacing, and typography), layout, interaction, accessibility, motion, and review checks.
static-web-artifacts-builder
Build self-contained static HTML artifacts opened in a browser: interactive diagrams, dashboards, infographics. Pure HTML5+CSS3+inline SVG, zero toolchain. Triggers on: "interactive HTML", "open in browser", "HTML artifact", "visual dashboard", "HTML infographic". NOT for PNG/SVG output, use concept-to-image.
accessibility
Use when making a web UI conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA — axe-core or Lighthouse a11y violations, keyboard operability, focus management, ARIA roles/names/live regions, contrast, tap-target size. NOT palette or visual intent (that is design), NOT test-runner setup (that is testing-web), NOT LCP/page-speed (that is…
ijfw-ui-spec
Use when the user says: 'ui spec', 'design contract', 'ui audit setup', 'lock the design', 'visual contract', 'ui review setup', or '/ijfw-ui-spec'. Produces UI-SPEC.md as the visual design contract before any frontend or visual-artifact build, and dispatches ijfw-ui-auditor as the final 6-pillar gate.
apply-mantel-styles
Provides guidelines for applying Mantel's brand styles to diagrams and frontend components. Use when asked to create visuals that need to align with Mantel's branding.