Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add arozumenko/sdlc-skills --skill xray-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arozumenko/sdlc-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/xray-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/xray-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/xray-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/xray-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arozumenko/sdlc-skills/xray-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.05135 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.02567 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01027 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00513 |
Grade A, and why
xray-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 435 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Xray — the TMS that lives inside Jira
Xray stores test cases and execution records as Jira issues of
specific issue types (Test, Precondition, Test Set,
Test Plan, Test Execution). That design is why this skill is
separate from atlassian-content: the Jira issue layer (ADF,
comments, mentions) is covered there; everything Xray-specific
(test steps, preconditions, test run statuses, results import,
coverage links) lives here and talks to Xray's own API.
This skill is transport-agnostic (GraphQL / REST / MCP / connector) and deployment-agnostic (Cloud or Server / DC).
When to load this skill
Load when the task involves reading, authoring, linking, or recording results against Xray entities:
- Fetching a Test's steps (structured, not the Jira description)
- Creating a Test / Precondition / Test Set / Test Plan
- Adding or editing steps on a Test
- Adding Tests to a Test Set / Test Plan
- Creating a Test Execution and reporting Test Run results
- Importing results from JUnit / Cucumber / NUnit / TestNG / generic Xray JSON
- Linking a Test to a story / requirement / bug for coverage
- Querying coverage ("which tests cover PROJ-42?" / "which requirements have no tests?")
Do NOT load for: pure Jira field reads / comment authoring on
Xray issue keys — those don't need Xray-specific endpoints.
Use atlassian-content for that.
Transport priority — check in this order on every call
MCP is first. The CLI is a fallback. Raw REST / GraphQL is a
last resort. Never default to scripts/xray.py when an MCP
tool already covers the operation — secrets stay out of agent
context when you go through MCP, and an MCP-wired project has
already invested in permissions / audit / reliability the CLI
can't match.
- MCP tools —
mcp__<server>__<toolset>_*(e.g.mcp__Elitea_Dev__JiraIntegration_get_issue_details,mcp__dmtools-cli__xray_get_test,mcp__mcp-xray__*). Discover with the host's MCP-listing command (copilot --list-mcp,claude mcp list, Cursor / Windsurf settings panel) and match the tool to the operation. Use the MCP if a matching tool exists, even if the skill's examples show CLI commands. - Bundled CLI —
scripts/xray.py(stdlib Python, zero deps). Only when no MCP tool covers the operation, or when the MCP server is offline. The CLI auto-detects Cloud vs Server, caches JWTs, and bakes in the re-fetch + validate discipline (exit 3 on mismatch). Seescripts/README.mdfor the surface. - Raw REST / GraphQL — assemble your own HTTP call. Reserve for debugging or when both MCP and the CLI are unavailable.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 435 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A b6ddb529678b
xray-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository arozumenko/sdlc-skills (20 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 5,135 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.