dvalin-security-scan

dvalin-security-scan is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from arthurpanhku/dvalincode. It costs 77 tokens per session (696 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A local code scanner that checks a whole workspace for common security flaws, such as injection attacks, exposed passwords, cross-site scripting, unsafe command execution, and risky shell use.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after changing code that handles user input, builds queries or commands, manages authentication, or adds dependencies, and when requesting a security audit.
Why use it?
It helps find security problems in code before they reach users. Results identify the affected file, line, rule, severity, and why the issue matters.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it after changing code that handles user input, builds queries or commands, manages authentication, or adds dependencies, and when requesting a security audit.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/arthurpanhku/dvalincode/dvalin-security-scan
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add arthurpanhku/dvalincode --skill dvalin-security-scan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arthurpanhku/dvalincode

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for dvalin-security-scan

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arthurpanhku/dvalincode/dvalin-security-scan/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/arthurpanhku/dvalincode/dvalin-security-scan)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arthurpanhku/dvalincode/dvalin-security-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arthurpanhku/dvalincode/dvalin-security-scan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for dvalin-security-scan

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/arthurpanhku/dvalincode/dvalin-security-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/arthurpanhku/dvalincode/dvalin-security-scan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 77 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 696 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 16
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00077 $0.00696
Opus 5 $0.00039 $0.00348
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00139
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00070

Measured 3d ago against content hash cf1be058749f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

dvalin-security-scan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

integrations/claude-code/skills/dvalin-security-scan/SKILL.md · 66 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Dvalin security scan

A deterministic scanner. No model runs and it never edits the target workspace. The default dvalin_scan MCP call is read-only and persists no state.

Running it

If a dvalin MCP server is configured, call dvalin_scan. Otherwise:

npx -y dvalincode security scan . --scanners builtin --json --no-workflow

Scan the whole workspace — the scanner takes a directory, not a file. builtin needs nothing installed. Add semgrep, trivy, or osv-scanner only if they are already on PATH; missing engines are reported, not fatal.

Reading the result

{ "score": 88, "grade": "B", "metrics": { "critical": 0, "high": 1 },
  "findings": [ { "ruleId": "dvalin/eval", "path": "app.js", "startLine": 3,
                  "securitySeverity": "7.5", "helpUri": "https://cwe.mitre.org/..." } ] }

Report findings by file and line, with the rule and why it matters. Cite helpUri when the user may not know the vulnerability class. securitySeverity is CVSS-shaped: ≥9 critical, ≥7 high, ≥4 medium.

What to do next

Fix findings the way you would fix any other bug: read the surrounding code first, then make the smallest change that removes the vulnerability class rather than the symptom. Add a regression test that fails on the old code. Re-run the scan to confirm.

When a reported finding will be repaired and the MCP server is available, call dvalin_begin_verification with the same scan arguments. This explicit step persists the compact workflow used by dvalin_get_finding and dvalin_verify_findings; do not create one merely to report scan results.

If the user wants Dvalin itself to do the repair under policy, with tests and a clean re-scan required before anything can become a PR:

dvalincode dvalin . --fix --verify --draft-pr

That command does use a model and edits files, so propose it rather than running it unprompted.

Honest limits

  • A clean scan is not proof the code is safe. It finds known high-signal patterns; it does not find business-logic flaws, and it can produce false positives. Say so instead of declaring the code secure.
  • Do not suppress a finding to make the scan pass. If something is genuinely a test fixture, exclude that path in .dvalincodeignore and say why.
  • The score is a triage heuristic, not a certification. Lead with the findings, not the number.

Read the full file on GitHub · 66 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago Changed · +4 lines cf1be058749f
  2. 9d ago First seen · 62 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 4c6e3db7c973

Subscribe to this mod's changes

dvalin-security-scan is a skill published in the GitHub repository arthurpanhku/dvalincode (114 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 696 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.