Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ashishwarkhade/Telegraph-MCP --skill telegraph-miner-testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ashishwarkhade/Telegraph-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ashishwarkhade/telegraph-mcp/telegraph-miner-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ashishwarkhade/telegraph-mcp/telegraph-miner-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ashishwarkhade/telegraph-mcp/telegraph-miner-tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ashishwarkhade/telegraph-mcp/telegraph-miner-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ashishwarkhade/telegraph-mcp/telegraph-miner-tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00765 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00382 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
telegraph-miner-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Telegraph Miner Tests
Run a repeatable batch of prompts against the Telegraph endpoint and produce an auditable JSONL response set.
Workflow
-
Identify the test inputs and output file.
- Use the repository's query fixture, normally
queries.json. - Preserve the existing output file, normally
responses_*.jsonl, so interrupted runs can resume. - Confirm the endpoint, model name, request timeout, and expected response format before sending requests.
- Use the repository's query fixture, normally
-
Validate the query fixture before making network calls.
- Load it as JSON.
- Require a non-empty list of objects.
- Require a non-empty unique
idfor every object. - Require a
queryvalue for every object. - Stop on malformed JSON, missing fields, duplicate IDs, or an empty fixture.
-
Inspect prior results for resumability.
- Parse the output as JSONL, one record at a time.
- Treat only records with
status: "received"and a matchingtest_idas complete. - Ignore blank lines and report malformed lines without discarding valid records.
- Reuse the exact test ID as the deduplication key.
-
Execute only pending cases.
- Send one request per pending query using the configured model and endpoint.
- Record an ISO-8601 UTC timestamp before each request.
- Append one JSON object per query and flush after each record.
- On success, persist the raw response with
status: "received". - On failure, persist
status: "error", the query metadata, and the error text, then continue with the remaining cases. - Do not mark an error as complete; a later run must retry it.
-
Report coverage and outcome.
- Show total queries, already completed cases, newly received cases, errors, and output path.
- Distinguish “all queries have received responses” from “the batch loop finished”.
- When errors remain, list their test IDs and the next retry command or action.
Decision Points
- If the output contains a received record for an ID, skip that ID unless the user explicitly requests a refresh.
- If an ID has only error records, retry it and append a new record rather than rewriting history.
- If the endpoint returns a non-JSON body, timeout, or transport error, preserve the failure as an error record and continue.
- If the response schema is unexpected but still valid JSON, retain the raw payload and flag the schema issue separately; do not silently coerce it.
- If the fixture changes IDs or queries, treat the new IDs as new work and leave historical output intact.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 70 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A c386e4f91782
telegraph-miner-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository ashishwarkhade/Telegraph-MCP (0 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 765 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.