Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ashtanko/compose-android-template --skill verify-android-changegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ashtanko/compose-android-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ashtanko/compose-android-template/verify-android-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ashtanko/compose-android-template/verify-android-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ashtanko/compose-android-template/verify-android-change/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ashtanko/compose-android-template/verify-android-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ashtanko/compose-android-template/verify-android-change.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00534 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00214 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
verify-android-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 37 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Android Change
Validate the behavior that changed first, then expand only as risk and scope justify. Read ../../reference/commands.md for the command matrix.
Workflow
- Inspect
git status --short, the relevant diff, untracked files in scope, and the affected module build files. Separate pre-existing user work from the current change. - Map changed files to behavior and Gradle modules. Account for downstream modules when public APIs, convention plugins, the version catalog, or shared resources changed.
- Run the narrowest deterministic check:
- documentation: verify local links, paths, and command examples;
- shell:
bash -nand a supported dry run; - JVM logic: the owning module's
testtask, narrowed with--testswhile iterating; - Android logic or Compose state: the owning module's
testDebugUnitTesttask; - localized text resources:
make localization-check; - resources, manifest, or Android configuration: the owning module's
lintDebugor assemble task.
- Run
./gradlew spotlessCheckfor Kotlin or Gradle Kotlin DSL changes. Run Detekt and Android lint when production code or build configuration changed. - Broaden to
make verifyfor shared build logic, dependency changes, public API changes, or pre-PR verification. - Recheck the diff after any formatter, generator, baseline task, or build that may produce tracked files.
- Report the exact commands and outcomes. Explain skipped device, screenshot, benchmark, or environment-dependent checks.
Visual and baseline changes
- Verify screenshots when UI output changed and screenshot coverage exists.
- Never update screenshot goldens, dependency-guard baselines, lint baselines, or baseline profiles merely to make a check pass.
- Review every generated artifact when an intentional baseline update is part of the request.
Failure handling
- Read the first actionable failure and distinguish a source defect from a missing SDK, unavailable device, network problem, or pre-existing unrelated failure.
- Fix implementation failures that are in scope, then rerun the narrow check before the broad suite.
- Do not hide failures with exclusions, relaxed rules, or regenerated baselines unless the task explicitly changes that policy.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 91cde4294f83
verify-android-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository ashtanko/compose-android-template (13 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 534 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
compose-ui-testing
Expert guidance on Jetpack Compose UI testing with createAndroidComposeRule, semantics matchers, synchronization, and screenshot tests with Paparazzi or Roborazzi. Use this for instrumented and screenshot UI tests.
android-ui-journey-testing
XML-specified Android UI journey testing, interactive step execution, assertion verification, and JSON outcome reporting.
solopi-ai
A command-line framework for testing Android apps and devices with SoloPi, including on-device or cloud AI decision models. It manages devices, test cases, recorded interactions, replays, performance history, and evidence.
mobile-automation
Control Android and iOS devices, emulators and simulators — launch apps, tap, swipe, type, take screenshots, read the accessibility tree. Use when a task involves a mobile device or app, mobile UI testing, or reproducing a bug on a phone.
sceneview
Build 3D and AR apps with the SceneView SDK in Jetpack Compose, SwiftUI (iOS/macOS/visionOS via SceneViewSwift), Web (Filament.js), Flutter and React Native. Use whenever the user asks for "3D in Compose", "AR with ARCore in Compose", a model viewer, or any cross-platform 3D/AR app where the dependency is…
sceneview-ios
Build 3D and AR apps on Apple platforms (iOS, macOS, visionOS) with SceneViewSwift — the SwiftUI wrapper around RealityKit. Use whenever the user asks for "3D in SwiftUI", "AR with ARKit in SwiftUI", a model viewer for iOS, or any Apple-platform 3D/AR app where the dependency is the SceneViewSwift Swift Package from…