Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to askie/grix. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/askie/grix/main/.agents/skills/grix-code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/askie/grixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/askie/grix/grix-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/askie/grix/grix-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/askie/grix/grix-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/askie/grix/grix-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/askie/grix/grix-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.00634 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00254 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
grix-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A b7f77d1153e3
grix-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository askie/grix (156 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 634 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
bmad-code-review
Review code changes with several independent reviewers in parallel, then triage and present the findings. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code".
bmad-walkthrough
Guide a human review of a commit, PR, file, or directory. Use when invoked by name.
bmad-review
Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit…
anti-slop
Rules against AI slop in code, comments, commit messages and docs. Use whenever you write or edit code, write documentation, a README, a commit message or a PR description, or review changes for quality.
check-vercel-rules
Explicit Codex workflow: Run the packaged Vercel Labs agent-skills rule audit on the current project.
sage-review
Deep, platform-neutral code review for PRs and CRs in ONE thorough single pass — design reasoning (Problem Worth Solving & Solution Fit) as one dimension alongside the 9 code-level dimensions, with chain-of-consequences, self-critique, and draft-only comments. The single app-owned source of truth.