Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add assafkip/kipi-system --skill audhd-executive-functiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/assafkip/kipi-systemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/assafkip/kipi-system/audhd-executive-function)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/assafkip/kipi-system/audhd-executive-function"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/assafkip/kipi-system/audhd-executive-function/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/assafkip/kipi-system/audhd-executive-function"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/assafkip/kipi-system/audhd-executive-function.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 167 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.03097 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01239 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00619 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00310 |
Grade A, and why
audhd-executive-function scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- audhd-executive-function — 88% identical, 76 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 292 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AUDHD Executive Function Skill
You are building an external executive function system for a user with AUDHD (combined ADHD + Autism). This skill governs how ALL daily outputs are structured, especially the daily schedule HTML.
Always read these files first:
references/research.md- AUDHD research and design principlesreferences/user-profile.md- this specific user's behavioral profile
The daily HTML is not a briefing. It is the user's entire workday, pre-loaded and ready to execute action by action. The system IS their executive function, working memory, follow-up tracker, relationship manager, and copywriter.
THE ONE RULE
If the user cannot copy-paste it, click it, or check it off, it does not belong in the output.
Everything else flows from this.
ACTIONABILITY RULES (ENFORCED)
A1: No Cross-References
Never say "see section above," "copy-paste from section X," or "refer to file Y." Every checklist item contains the actual text inline with a Copy button. The user never scrolls or searches.
A2: Next Physical Action
Every item is the literal next physical thing the user does. Not "Follow up with Sarah" but the actual email text in a copy box. If a draft can't be pre-written (needs user's eyes first), say exactly that: "Read Sarah's message first, then respond. No pre-written draft."
A3: All Pending Actions Get Drafts
Every pending action that's due today or this week appears in the HTML with a pre-written draft message. No action item exists without its corresponding copy-paste text.
A4: Recent Meeting Follow-ups
All meetings from the past 48 hours produce follow-up items with full draft text. Call happened yesterday = follow-up email is in today's Quick Wins.
A5: Dashboards at the Bottom
Pipeline health, temperature scores, and analytics go in collapsed sections at the bottom. The top of the HTML is ONLY actionable items. A dashboard number without an attached action and draft is informational waste.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 292 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 680abc7e0cde
audhd-executive-function is a skill published in the GitHub repository assafkip/kipi-system (128 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 3,097 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
core
This skill should be used when the user says "capture memory", "save to memory", "remember this", or trigger phrases like: "I've decided", "let's use", "we're going with", "I learned", "turns out", "TIL", "discovered", "I'm stuck", "blocked by", "always use", "never do", "convention is". Also triggers on recall…
format
MIF (Modeled Information Format) 1.4.2 Level 3 memory templates and formatting guidelines.
custodian
Memory system custodian for health checks, validation, and maintenance. Trigger phrases: "check memory health", "validate memories", "fix broken links", "update decay", "relocate memories", "audit memories", "memory maintenance", "custodian", "memory health".
ontology
Ontology-based entity discovery and validation for mnemonic memories. Define custom namespaces, entity types, traits, and relationships. Triggers: "entity discovery", "validate ontology", "define namespaces", "resolve entity references", "list ontologies", "show namespaces", "entity types", "entity relationships"…
search
This skill should be used when the user says "search memories", "find in memories", "grep mnemonic", "look for memory", "deep search", "synthesize knowledge", or asks questions like "what do we know about X". Provides progressive disclosure and enhanced iterative search with synthesis.
blackboard
Cross-session handoff, persistent context via blackboard, and agent coordination patterns.