Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add asteasolutions/ai-toolkit --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asteasolutions/ai-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asteasolutions/ai-toolkit/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asteasolutions/ai-toolkit/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asteasolutions/ai-toolkit/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asteasolutions/ai-toolkit/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asteasolutions/ai-toolkit/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00516 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00206 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 38 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Copilot Code Review
When reviewing this change, apply BOTH of the following skills as complete rubrics. Do not skip either pass.
- thermo-nuclear-review - bugs, breaking changes, security issues, developer-experience regressions, and feature-gate leaks. Only added or modified code.
- thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review - code-judo / structural simplification, 1k-line file growth, spaghetti branching, boundaries, and abstraction quality.
If those skills are not already in context, load them by name from sibling skill directories. If they cannot be loaded, still run both passes using the same intent: a harsh correctness/security audit of the diff, then a harsh maintainability audit of the same diff.
Apply any repository instructions (AGENTS.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, path-specific *.instructions.md) as constraints on findings and remediations. Those files are the source of repo-specific policy. This skill is not.
Workflow
- Determine review scope from the PR, branch, or changed files. Gather the diff and enough surrounding file context to evaluate the change without guessing.
- Apply the correctness/security rubric to the diff. Trace cross-module side effects. Do not report pre-existing issues in untouched code. Do not present unfinished research when the related code is in this repository.
- Apply the code-quality rubric to the same diff. Search for structural simplifications, not just local cleanup.
- Synthesize one review. Findings first, deduplicated across both passes. Weight overlapping findings more heavily. Resolve disagreements with your own judgment. Keep summaries brief.
Output
Prefer a small number of high-conviction comments over a long list of nits.
Priority order:
- Correctness, breakage, and security
- Structural code-quality regressions and missed code-judo simplifications
- Spaghetti / branching complexity, boundary leaks, file-size explosions
- Remaining maintainability issues that still matter
For each finding include file references, evidence, and a concrete remediation that fits this repository's instructions. Do not rubber-stamp "it works" if the change makes the codebase messier or leaves an obvious simpler structure unused.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 5011f1484389
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository asteasolutions/ai-toolkit (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 516 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
code-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-reviewasteasolutions/ai-toolkit | Skill | 5 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |
| autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub | Skill | 9.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.2k | today | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiff-planumputun/revdiff | Skill | 947 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| explore-unknownsdzhng/skills | Skill | 1.4k | today | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code, Codex |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |