Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add astordu/qoderharness --skill test5-implementation-coverage-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/astordu/qoderharnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/astordu/qoderharness/test5-implementation-coverage-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/astordu/qoderharness/test5-implementation-coverage-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/astordu/qoderharness/test5-implementation-coverage-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/astordu/qoderharness/test5-implementation-coverage-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/astordu/qoderharness/test5-implementation-coverage-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.00844 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00338 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
test5-implementation-coverage-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
实现与覆盖审查
用已确认的测试矩阵 CSV 审查当前代码和已有测试。不要把代码当成需求来源；矩阵是标准，代码是被审查对象。
输入
读取：
.qoder/test-matrix/<feature-id>.csv
同时读取必要的代码事实：
- DTO / Schema / 类型定义
- API Route / Controller
- Service 或核心业务模块
- 前端关键组件
- 已有测试文件
只读取与矩阵行相关的文件，不做无边界全仓库分析。
输出
更新同一个 CSV，不创建新文件。
主要更新字段：
implementation_statustest_statusactionevidencenotes
状态取值
implementation_status：
not_checked：尚未审查。implemented：代码已满足矩阵要求。missing：矩阵要求存在，但代码未实现。partial：实现不完整或行为不确定。out_of_scope：矩阵范围控制项或 PRD 范围外项。
test_status：
not_generated：还没有对应测试。generated：已有测试代码，但未确认运行结果。passing：测试存在且通过。failing：测试存在但失败。manual_only：仅人工验收。
action：
generate_test：代码已实现但测试缺失，下一步生成测试。fix_code：矩阵要求存在但代码缺失或偏差，下一步补实现。manual_review：需要人判断是改需求、改代码还是改测试。defer：延后。ignore：范围外，不处理。
审查原则
- PRD 和矩阵决定“该不该测”；代码只帮助判断“实现了没有、怎么测”。
- 代码里有但矩阵没有的功能，不自动加入本需求测试。
- 矩阵有但代码没有的功能，标记为实现缺口，不删除矩阵行。
- Service 覆盖不等于 API 覆盖，API 覆盖不等于 UI/E2E 覆盖。
- 证据必须写具体文件路径、测试文件路径或命令结果摘要。
分流逻辑
| 发现 | CSV 标记 | 后续 |
|---|---|---|
| 代码已实现，测试也覆盖 | implemented + passing |
保持 |
| 代码已实现，但没有测试 | implemented + not_generated + generate_test |
调用 tdd 或测试生成流程 |
| 代码没实现，但矩阵要求 | missing + fix_code |
回开发 Agent 补代码 |
| 代码和矩阵不一致 | partial + manual_review |
人判断 |
| PRD 范围外 | out_of_scope + ignore |
不纳入本功能验证 |
下一步
完成后提示：
如果 CSV 中存在 action=generate_test，下一步建议调用 tdd：
从 selected_for_validation=Y 且 action=generate_test 的行中挑一个测试点，按红-绿-重构生成可执行测试。
如果 CSV 中存在 action=fix_code，先回开发 Agent 补齐实现，再重新调用 test5-implementation-coverage-reviewer。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 94 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A a10d8206b183
test5-implementation-coverage-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository astordu/qoderharness (38 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 844 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
plugin-review
Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.