Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to atherio-danp/cde-dotnetcc. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/atherio-danp/cde-dotnetcc/main/.claude/skills/dotnet-performance-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/atherio-danp/cde-dotnetccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/atherio-danp/cde-dotnetcc/dotnet-performance-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/atherio-danp/cde-dotnetcc/dotnet-performance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/atherio-danp/cde-dotnetcc/dotnet-performance-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/atherio-danp/cde-dotnetcc/dotnet-performance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/atherio-danp/cde-dotnetcc/dotnet-performance-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01101 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00550 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00220 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-performance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 48 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 1f3b95c7dd96
dotnet-performance-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository atherio-danp/cde-dotnetcc (109 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,101 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-dotnet-performance
Scans .NET code for 50 performance anti-patterns across async, memory, strings, collections, LINQ, regex, serialization, and I/O with tiered severity classification. Use when analyzing .NET code for optimization opportunities, reviewing hot paths, or auditing allocation-heavy patterns.
code-review-csharp
Perform structured code reviews of C# source code covering naming conventions, performance, security, readability, and .NET best practices. Trigger phrases include "review this C# code", "check my C# for best practices", "analyze this C# class", "find issues in my C# code".
de-sloppify
Systematic code cleanup pipeline for .NET projects. Runs 7 ordered steps: formatting, unused usings, analyzer warnings, dead code removal, TODO resolution, sealed class audit, and CancellationToken propagation. Each step is verified independently with tests between phases. Load this skill when: "clean up"…
resharper-clt
Use the free official JetBrains ReSharper Command Line Tools for .NET repositories. USE FOR: jb inspectcode; jb cleanupcode; stronger C# inspections, cleanup profiles, and CI-friendly JetBrains analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing tests with inspection output; ad-hoc formatting-only work when the repo intentionally…
roslynator
Use the open-source free Roslynator analyzer packages and optional CLI for .NET. USE FOR: Roslynator.Analyzers setup; Roslynator CLI checks or cleanup; C# linting, static analysis, and code-fix automation. DO NOT USE FOR: overlapping analyzer packs with no consolidation plan; formatting-only work owned by another…
stylecop-analyzers
Use the open-source free StyleCop.Analyzers package for naming, layout, documentation, and style rules in .NET projects. Use when a repo wants stricter style conventions than the SDK analyzers alone provide. USE FOR: the repo wants StyleCop.Analyzers; naming, layout, or documentation style needs stronger enforcement…