Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add athola/claude-night-market --skill dorodangogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/athola/claude-night-marketWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/athola/claude-night-market/dorodango)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/athola/claude-night-market/dorodango"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/athola/claude-night-market/dorodango/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/athola/claude-night-market/dorodango"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/athola/claude-night-market/dorodango.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01238 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00495 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
dorodango scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dorodango Polishing Workflow
Named after the Japanese art of polishing a ball of dirt into a high-gloss sphere. Applied to code: take the initial implementation (the "mud ball") and refine it through successive quality passes until it shines.
When To Use
- After initial implementation is complete and tests pass
- Code works but needs refinement across multiple quality dimensions
- Preparing code for review or release
- Resuming a previous polishing session
When NOT To Use
- Code does not compile or pass basic tests (fix first)
- Single-dimension improvement needed (use the specific skill directly: pensive:code-refinement, etc.)
- Greenfield design phase (use brainstorming instead)
Pass Sequence
Four quality dimensions, each a self-contained pass:
- Correctness - run tests, fix failures
- Clarity - code readability and structure
- Consistency - naming, patterns, style alignment
- Polish - documentation, error messages, edges
See modules/pass-definitions.md for detailed scope
of each pass type.
Convergence Model
- Each pass targets one dimension
- A dimension converges on a record, never on the passing subagent's own count alone: correctness on the test command's exit code, clarity and consistency on the linter and formatter exit codes plus a reviewer count of 0, polish on a reviewer count of 0 from a fresh subagent that did not make the edits
- A pass that reports
issues_found: 0without the matching exit code recorded in the state file has not converged - Convergence is reversible: a later pass that finds a regression in a converged dimension un-converges it, and that dimension is re-run before the run completes
- When all 4 dimensions converge, polishing is complete
- Maximum 10 total passes (hard limit)
- If not converged after 10 passes, surface state to human with recommendation to split into smaller units
State Persistence
State tracked in .attune/dorodango-state.json:
{
"target": "plugins/foo",
"started_at": "2026-03-18T12:00:00Z",
"pass_count": 3,
"passes": [
{
"type": "correctness",
"issues_found": 2,
"issues_fixed": 2
},
{
"type": "clarity",
"issues_found": 5,
"issues_fixed": 5
},
{
"type": "consistency",
"issues_found": 0
}
],
"converged_dimensions": ["consistency"],
"converged": false
}
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago Changed · +15 lines 61bde0faa6bc
- 1mo ago First seen · 143 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A dd9002d4e7c6
dorodango is a skill published in the GitHub repository athola/claude-night-market (343 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,238 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ring:using-assert
Using lib-observability/assert, Lerian's runtime assertion package, in two modes. Sweep Mode detects panic()/log.Fatal zero-panic violations, DIY invariant checks, hand-rolled domain predicates, and missing InitAssertionMetrics. Reference Mode catalogs the asserter lifecycle, domain predicates, observability trident…
ring:fixing-lint
Fixing lint to a clean state: runs the linter, groups reported issues into independent streams, and dispatches one parallel fixer agent per stream (ring:backend-go for Go, ring:general-purpose otherwise), iterating until clean. Use when a codebase has lint errors across multiple files. Skip for a single error (fix…
ring:detecting-goroutine-leaks
Detecting goroutine leaks in Go: greps for goroutine patterns, audits goleak coverage (VerifyTestMain/VerifyNone), runs goleak, and dispatches ring:backend-go to fix leaks and add regression tests. Use after implementation or during review when code spawns goroutines or a leak is suspected. Runs before…
ring:test-driven-development
Enforcing the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR loop: write one failing test and watch it fail, write minimal code to pass, then refactor green. Use when starting implementation of a new feature or bugfix, or writing any new production code. Requires pasted failure output as proof of RED; code written before its test must be…
addressing-review-feedback
How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in needrevision or PR review comments are in your context.
refactoring-workflow
Improve the structure of existing code without changing its behaviour, in small verified steps under a green test suite. Use when the user asks to refactor, clean up, restructure or simplify code, wants to reduce duplication or coupling, is preparing a codebase for a feature it cannot currently accommodate, or when…