Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add atstaeff/ai-agents --skill work-managementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/atstaeff/ai-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/atstaeff/ai-agents/work-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/atstaeff/ai-agents/work-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/atstaeff/ai-agents/work-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/atstaeff/ai-agents/work-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/atstaeff/ai-agents/work-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00418 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00167 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
work-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Work Management
- Inspect relevant instructions and existing work. A small edit uses the conversation and appropriate checks; create no process file automatically.
- For larger work, reuse or create one
.ai/work/<slug>.mdper outcome using the template or CLI. Sessions and agents share it. - Define the goal, constraints, observable acceptance criteria and a short ordered plan.
Use stable task IDs with states
open,in_progress,blockedanddone. - Update evidence as work happens. Implementation progress and acceptance verification are separate: a changed file alone does not prove resulting behavior.
- Preserve human feedback verbatim with stable IDs and an explicit disposition. Record only consequential decisions and their reasons.
- Archive in
.ai/archive/when the outcome is verified and unresolved feedback is reviewed. Link reusable knowledge into existing documentation or the private vault.
Safe updates and handoffs
- Read the current record and relevant files; load historical work only when needed. Before rewriting, compare against the version read and preserve intervening edits. Retry or resolve conflicts; never replace a record from a stale session snapshot.
- The dashboard edits the same Markdown file using ETag checks. Filesystem updates require the same reread and comparison discipline.
- A completed task needs evidence. If a required check cannot run, record why, the affected criterion and the next action. Keep verification outstanding unless other adequate evidence establishes it; never archive an unverified outcome.
- Keep shared rules in the toolkit and local constraints in project
AGENTS.md. Keepdocs/for its existing purpose. CSV is generated, not maintained separately. - Follow repository privacy rules. Keep private vault notes and configuration out of public records. Report the outcome, actual checks and material limits concisely.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · +4 lines e51198310755
- 12d ago First seen · 31 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 798f91947d2a
work-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository atstaeff/ai-agents (3 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 418 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-08.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
handle-linkedin-connection-request-signal
Use this skill when someone sends a team member an inbound LinkedIn connection request. An inbound request is a deliberate, ACTIVE first-party intent signal — meaningfully stronger than a passive profile view — and it deserves different scoring rules. The skill resolves and enriches the requester, gates them through…
remove
Remove a deployed framework or addon from the current workspace.