Authgear is an open-source identity and authentication service that provides login, account management, multi-factor authentication, passkeys, and single sign-on for applications. SaaS and mobile-app developers can run it themselves or use Authgear Cloud to manage consumer and enterprise user access. The catalogue entries relate to operating and configuring Authgear's authentication workflows.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to authgear/authgear-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/authgear/authgear-server/main/.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/authgear/authgear-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/authgear/authgear-server/review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/authgear/authgear-server/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/authgear/authgear-server/review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/authgear/authgear-server/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/authgear/authgear-server/review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.07933 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.03173 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.01587 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00793 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 165 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Produce a code review report for the commits on the current branch that are not yet on the upstream main branch. This skill has three phases: scoping, an initial report, and a mandatory verification pass that re-derives every finding with an objective check (not re-reading the same code and nodding along).
Phase 1: Scope the PR correctly
Do NOT assume the local master/main branch is up to date — in this repo it is frequently stale by hundreds of commits. Establish the true upstream base first:
- Run
git remote -vand identify the canonical upstream remote (the one pointing atauthgear/authgear-server, conventionally namedauthgear; ask the user if ambiguous or absent). git fetch <upstream-remote> main --quietgit merge-base HEAD <upstream-remote>/main— this is the true base, regardless of what localmasterpoints at.git log --oneline <base>..HEADto enumerate exactly the commits in scope. Sanity-check this list againstgit log --oneline -5from the repo status — if the top commits don't match what the user expects, stop and re-check the remote/branch choice before proceeding.git diff --stat <upstream-remote>/main..HEAD— if the stat includes files unrelated to the commit subjects (e.g. translation files, unrelated scripts), that means upstreammainhas advanced independently on other work; this is normal and not part of the PR. Don't let it inflate the reported scope — cross-check withgit show --stat <commit>for each commit in step 4 individually to get the true per-commit file list.
Phase 2: Write the report
Structure the report under these seven headings. Base every claim on an actual diff read (git show <commit>, git diff <base>..HEAD -- <path>), not on commit message text alone — commit messages describe intent, not necessarily what the code does.
Give every finding an ID and a name
Every finding under Code quality, Bugs, Behavior changes, Security and Performance gets an ID, a severity, and a short name — not just bugs. Bare bullets make findings impossible to accept, reject or refer back to one at a time.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +7 lines a8f2c3817681
- 10d ago Changed eaaa76b07982
- 28d ago Changed · +10 lines 923608dcffb4
- 29d ago Changed · +2 lines 314fa9b3fc1d
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 21f0c1a93123
- 1mo ago Changed · +43 lines · +3 tokens per session 834e100169ca
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines b61d9bf61760
- 1mo ago Changed · +9 lines 46937f004e39
- 2mo ago First seen · 92 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 9fd8c60f1998
review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository authgear/authgear-server (2,133 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 7,933 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
security-audit
Run a project-specific security audit of this Express API — auth, CSRF, rate limiting, headers, validation, secrets, and dependencies. Use when the user asks for a security review, audit, hardening pass, or before a release.
auth0-docs
Auth0 — identity platform: auth flows, Universal Login, SSO, identity providers, MFA, RBAC, Actions, tokens.
keycloak-upgrade-readiness
Assess whether Skycloak-managed Keycloak clusters are ready to upgrade, work out what the new version breaks, and sequence the rollout across environments with a tested rollback plan. Use when asked to upgrade Keycloak, review version drift, or plan an upgrade rollout.
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.