Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to av/mi. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/av/mi/master/.agents/skills/agent-integration-testing/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/av/miWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/av/mi/agent-integration-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/av/mi/agent-integration-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/av/mi/agent-integration-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/av/mi/agent-integration-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/av/mi/agent-integration-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00800 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00320 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
agent-integration-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 70 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 449d97875c6f
agent-integration-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository av/mi (103 stars, last pushed 18d ago), with no licence file. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 800 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa
General-purpose QA verdict for any artifact type.
benchmark-design
Design and calibrate a multi-Case capability Benchmark and establish a traceable Formal Baseline, or import a published Benchmark package.
agent-evaluation
Run one specified Test Agent on one specified Benchmark Case exactly once, privately score that execution, and return one protocol result.
agent-optimization
Improve an Agent State through versioned scores and score-linked Traces from a frozen Benchmark.
implement
Use when an approved plan and task list exist and it is time to turn them into working, tested code — the SDD phase after analyze and before verify. Enforces TDD: a failing test comes before the code that makes it pass, one task at a time, appended to a progress ledger that survives compaction. Delegates test tooling…
agent-eval
Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT building the agent loop, tools or RAG…