Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Avinava/anypoint-connect --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Avinava/anypoint-connectWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/avinava/anypoint-connect/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/avinava/anypoint-connect/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/avinava/anypoint-connect/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/avinava/anypoint-connect/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/avinava/anypoint-connect/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00711 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00284 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review anypoint-connect
Review against the repository's observable behavior and safety contracts. Use the user's requested scope; ask only when a missing decision would materially change the result.
Establish context
- Read the relevant implementation, tests, documentation, and current diff before drawing conclusions.
- Inspect
package.json,mkdocs.yml, and the applicable workflows when compatibility or release behavior is in scope. - Preserve unrelated working-tree changes. Use
rgorrg --filesfor discovery. - Report reviews evidence-first with file and line references. Implement changes only when requested.
Project invariants
Treat a violation of these contracts as a correctness or security issue:
- Authentication uses the user Authorization Code flow with
full offline_access; Client ID and Secret alone do not create an authorized session or provide supported headless CI authentication. - Authorization callbacks must be bound to a one-time state and an HTTP loopback host. Callback HTML must escape dynamic values and must not leak codes, state, secrets, or provider details to another origin.
- Client Secrets must not appear in command examples, logs, fixtures, screenshots, or realistic-looking literals. Interactive secret input stays masked. Profile configuration is user-restricted and tokens remain encrypted at rest.
- Credential precedence is process environment, active profile, then legacy project
.env. Changing credential sources does not replace browser authorization. - MCP mutations preview by default and require explicit confirmation. Production and deletion safeguards must remain bound to the reviewed target. Direct library clients do not inherit CLI/MCP confirmation gates.
- Operational CLI commands use the resolved active profile; only commands that actually declare
--profilemay be documented with it. - Examples use synthetic application, profile, organization, and environment names. Package pins in
README, docs, and examples match
package.json.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A ffa394d44d3f
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Avinava/anypoint-connect (1 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 711 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
code-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-reviewAvinava/anypoint-connect | Skill | 1 | 10d ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code, Codex |
| autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub | Skill | 9.5k | today | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.2k | today | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiff-planumputun/revdiff | Skill | 947 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| explore-unknownsdzhng/skills | Skill | 1.4k | today | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code, Codex |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |