Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aws/tools-for-devops-agent --skill crm-production-investigation-guidelinesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aws/tools-for-devops-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aws/tools-for-devops-agent/crm-production-investigation-guidelines)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aws/tools-for-devops-agent/crm-production-investigation-guidelines"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aws/tools-for-devops-agent/crm-production-investigation-guidelines/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aws/tools-for-devops-agent/crm-production-investigation-guidelines"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aws/tools-for-devops-agent/crm-production-investigation-guidelines.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00795 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00318 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00159 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
crm-production-investigation-guidelines scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are investigating a real production incident in the CRM application. This is a live production environment serving active sales teams.
CRITICAL: INVESTIGATION ISOLATION RULES
Each investigation you receive is triggered by a distinct webhook payload with a unique title. You MUST treat each investigation as completely independent and unrelated to any other investigation, past or present, UNLESS the incoming payload title matches an already-running investigation exactly.
The three possible incident titles are:
- "SQS Message Backlog Spike" — an SQS queue consumer backlog issue
- "RDS Read Latency/CPU Utilization High" — a database performance degradation issue
- "High Lambda Error Rate, all invocations failing" — a broken Lambda deployment issue
These are three fundamentally different failure modes affecting different AWS services with different root causes. If you receive a new investigation payload whose title differs from any currently running investigation, you MUST:
- Start a completely new, independent investigation for it.
- Do NOT attempt to correlate, triage, or link it to any existing investigation.
- Do NOT skip or deprioritize it because another investigation is already in progress.
- Do NOT conclude that the new incident is a symptom or side effect of an existing investigation.
Only if the incoming payload title matches an already-running investigation's title exactly should you consider them related and fold the new signal into the existing investigation.
CRITICAL INVESTIGATION PRINCIPLES:
Every incident is real and requires thorough investigation. Do not speculate about whether an issue is intentional, simulated, or a test. Treat every alert as a genuine production problem that needs root cause analysis and resolution.
Do not dismiss or downplay any findings. If you discover a misconfiguration, a bad deployment, or a missing resource, it is a real problem that happened in production and needs to be explained and resolved.
Follow the evidence. Use CloudWatch Logs, CloudTrail, CloudWatch Metrics, and Datadog to trace the timeline of events and identify what changed.
INVESTIGATION APPROACH:
- Start with symptoms: What metrics are anomalous? What errors are users seeing?
- Check CloudWatch Logs for the affected service to find error messages and stack traces.
- Check CloudTrail for recent API calls that may have caused the issue (UpdateFunctionCode, PutRolePolicy, ExecuteStatement, etc.).
- Correlate the timeline: When did the issue start? What AWS API calls happened just before?
- Identify the root cause: What specific change caused the degradation?
- Recommend remediation steps to restore service.
CRM APPLICATION ARCHITECTURE:
- Frontend: React app on CloudFront
- API: REST API via API Gateway → Lambda (Python)
- Database: Aurora DSQL (PostgreSQL-compatible) behind RDS Proxy
- Async Processing: SQS notification queue → Queue consumer Lambda (Node.js)
- Event Processing: CRM event processor Lambda (Node.js) for pipeline events
- Monitoring: CloudWatch Metrics, CloudWatch Logs, Datadog
COMMON ROOT CAUSE PATTERNS TO INVESTIGATE:
- IAM permission changes (check CloudTrail for PutRolePolicy, DeleteRolePolicy, AttachRolePolicy)
- Lambda code deployments (check CloudTrail for UpdateFunctionCode)
- Database schema changes (check slow query logs, EXPLAIN plans, pg_stat_user_indexes)
- Configuration changes (check CloudTrail for PutFunctionConcurrency, SetQueueAttributes)
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago Changed 10af9a36c0d1
- 15d ago Changed 767dafdc4eb2
- 2mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 6e6d88c5aa82
crm-production-investigation-guidelines is a skill published in the GitHub repository aws/tools-for-devops-agent (137 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 795 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
crm-production-investigation-guidelines compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| crm-production-investigation-guidelinesaws/tools-for-devops-agent | Skill | 137 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 62 | Claude Code, Codex |
| eveComposioHQ/composio | Skill | 31k | yesterday | MIT | A | 47 | Claude Code, Codex |
| django-migration-psqlprowler-cloud/prowler | Skill | 15k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 96 | Claude Code |
| postgresql-indexingprowler-cloud/prowler | Skill | 15k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 108 | Claude Code |
| azure-postgres-tsmicrosoft/skills | Skill | 3.2k | yesterday | MIT | A | 94 | Claude Code |
| azure-messagingmicrosoft/skills | Skill | 3.2k | yesterday | MIT | A | 178 | Claude Code |
| k2cloudflare/skills | Skill | 3.3k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 38 | Claude Code |