Composio is a software toolkit that gives AI agents access to authenticated tools for interacting with apps and services. Developers use its SDKs, command-line interface, sessions, and sandbox to build agents that can carry out actions. The catalogue add-ons support workflows for using Composio with coding agents.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/composiohq/composio/evenpx skills add ComposioHQ/composio --skill evegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ComposioHQ/composioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/composiohq/composio/eve)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/composiohq/composio/eve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/composiohq/composio/eve.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00248 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00050 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
eve scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
eve
eve is a filesystem-first framework for durable backend AI agents. An agent is a directory on disk — instructions, skills, tools, connections, channels, subagents, and schedules are all files — and eve compiles and runs it.
Source of truth
The complete documentation ships inside the eve package. Do not rely on this
skill for guidance — always read the bundled docs, which match the installed
version exactly:
node_modules/eve/docs/
Start with node_modules/eve/docs/README.md. It contains the full
index and recommended reading order. Before writing any eve code, read the
relevant guide there first.
If eve is not installed yet, install it (npm install eve) or scaffold a new
agent with npx eve init <agent-name>, then read the bundled docs.
See references/source-of-truth.md for the repo-local handoff boundary.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 30 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 3db35e58e893
eve is a skill published in the GitHub repository ComposioHQ/composio (30,055 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 248 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
final-release-review
Perform pre-release planning or a final release-candidate review for openai-agents-python by comparing the target with the previous remote tag, determining the minimum compatible release type, auditing regressions and contract changes, reviewing open documentation PR coverage, drafting minor-release Key Changes, and…
implementation-strategy
Choose compatibility-aware scope for runtime and API changes in openai-agents-python. Use before initial implementation and each review-feedback batch to decide whether to patch, reset the design, preserve compatibility, or reject unsupported cases.
pr-draft-summary
Create the required PR-ready summary block, branch suggestion, title, and draft description for openai-agents-python. Use before the final response whenever the current task changed runtime code, tests, examples, build/test configuration, or docs with behavior impact, regardless of perceived change size and including…
examples-run-analysis
Analyze artifacts from the latest completed manual examples Make run. Read the main log, every relevant per-example log, and example source; validate every exit-0 example and classify failures, skips, and environment restrictions. Never execute or control examples.
playwright
Use when the task requires capturing or automating a real browser from the terminal.
implementation-final-review
Perform the repository's risk-tiered independent final review before implementation completion. Use only when explicitly invoked or when repository instructions require it after behavior-impacting implementation work; audit the complete task diff, supported contracts, lifecycle and security boundaries, complexity, and…