Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Axect/magi-researchers/plugin install magi-researchersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/axect/magi-researchers/research-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/axect/magi-researchers/research-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/axect/magi-researchers/research-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/axect/magi-researchers/research-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/axect/magi-researchers/research-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03792 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01896 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00758 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00379 |
Grade A, and why
research-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 298 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Research Test & Visualization Skill
Description
Creates tests for research code and generates publication-quality visualizations. Requires
implemented code in src/ of an active research output directory.
This skill does not execute the main research pipeline — that is Phase 3.5's responsibility
(/research-execute). If results/ is already populated, tests and visualizations use those
artifacts. If not, tests use mocks/fixtures and visualizations use inline-computed values.
Tool selection: Claude autonomously chooses testing and visualization tools to match the
languages and ecosystems already present in src/. No specific framework is mandated.
Usage
/research-test [path/to/output/dir]
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS— Optional path to the research output directory. If not provided, uses the most recentoutputs/*/directory.
Instructions
Shared rules: Read
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/shared/rules.mdbefore starting. §MCP, §Claude-Only, §Visualization apply to this skill. Inline fallback (if shared rules unavailable): Gemini models: gemini-3.1-pro-preview → gemini-2.5-pro → Claude. Codex: gpt-5.4. scienceplots['science','nature'], 300dpi PNG+PDF, Nature widths (3.5/7.2in). Subagents useReadtool.
Claude-Only Mode
See §Claude-Only in shared rules.
MCP Tool Rules
See §MCP in shared rules. Additionally:
- When to search: testing best practices, benchmark references, visualization techniques, domain-specific test patterns
Common Restrictions
Regardless of tool choices, all outputs must satisfy the following contracts. These are the interface between Phase 4 and Phase 5 (Report) — violating them breaks the pipeline.
| Restriction | Requirement | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Plot Manifest | All visualizations must be registered in plots/plot_manifest.json using the fixed schema below |
Phase 5 (Report) reads this file to assemble the report |
| Dual Format | Every plot must be saved as both PNG (300 dpi) and PDF or SVG | PNG for preview, PDF/SVG for publication |
| Execution Evidence | At least one test or verification must confirm the code runs without error | Validates implementation correctness |
| Dependency Spec | Any new test/viz dependencies must be added to the appropriate manifest (pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, DESCRIPTION, etc.) |
Reproducibility |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 298 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 44d57c248c8f
research-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository Axect/magi-researchers (13 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,792 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
experiment-audit
A review step that checks whether an experiment's reported results are supported by real data and a sufficiently broad test.
write-experiment-code
Produce the experiment code in an AIRAS experiment repository — against the execution contract stated here and the airas-eval input schema, with the environment fixed by lockfile and Dockerfile. Use to write, fix, or regenerate experiment code, whether authored directly or via an external code-generation tool.
gemini-code-exec
Run Python code in Gemini's sandboxed execution environment to verify math, test regex patterns, simulate logic, or validate algorithms without local execution. Use when you need computational verification without side effects.
paper-illustration
A workflow for generating academic illustrations, such as architecture diagrams and method visuals, with image generation and repeated review. Claude plans and checks the figure during the process.
experiment-plan
Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use after research-refine, or when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty…
ligandmpnn
Inverse-fold a backbone with ligand, nucleic-acid, and metal context using LigandMPNN (Dauparas et al. 2023, github.com/dauparas/LigandMPNN). Reach for this skill to redesign the residues lining a binding pocket around a bound small molecule or cofactor, to design metal-coordinating sites where the geometry must be…