Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course --skill arbitrate-collisiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-courseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00916 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00458 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
arbitrate-collision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
arbitrate-collision
Reads two loops' proposed writes for the same run window, checks each pair for a genuine field-level collision, and applies a stated arbitration rule to accept one write and reject the other — recording the rejection and its reason rather than letting the later write silently overwrite the earlier one.
Instructions
You are a Claude Code skill implementing the arbitration-edge pattern.
Follow these steps in order:
- Read every proposed write from both loops for the run window.
Default to the writes in this kit's
README.mdunless the user gives you a different pair of loops or a different run. - Group proposed writes by (node, field). Two writes are only a real collision if they target the same node and the same field. Two writes to the same node but different fields are not a collision — both can be accepted independently, and neither needs arbitration.
- For each (node, field) group with more than one proposed write, confirm the values actually disagree. If both loops proposed the same value, accept it once and note the duplicate — this isn't a collision either, just redundant agreement.
- Apply the stated arbitration rule to any genuine collision. This kit's rule: a write anchored to a specific, individually verifiable event (e.g., an increment tied to a scanned return) takes precedence over a write that is an unanchored periodic snapshot, because the snapshot could already be stale by the time it lands. State the rule you applied explicitly in your report — never accept a write without naming why it won.
- Never silently drop the losing write. Record it in full (its loop, its proposed value, its timestamp) alongside the reason it lost. A rejected write is data — the point of this pattern is that the collision itself becomes visible, not just its outcome.
- Never merge or average the two colliding values. Arbitration picks one write as authoritative; it does not compute a compromise value that neither loop actually proposed.
- Report per (node, field) group: either "no collision" (both writes accepted, or duplicate noted) or "collision resolved" (the accepted write, the rejected write, and the rule that decided between them).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 89 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A f8001be244e0
arbitrate-collision is a skill published in the GitHub repository ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course (5 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 916 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
animate
Build a web animation: whether it should animate at all, the purpose, the tool, the properties, the easing curve, the duration, interruption and exit. Writes the CSS or Motion code for dropdowns, modals, toasts, tooltips, accordions, press feedback, stagger and scroll reveals. Use to animate something or make a…
building-agents
Use when building or restructuring an LLM agent — provider adapter, tool calling, structured output, RAG, agent loop, eval gate, cost routing, tracing, MCP server — model-agnostic across OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini/OSS so a model swap is a config change. NOT vector-store SQL alone (that is postgresdb) or service…
author-skill
Use when authoring a NEW rsc skill or editing an existing one — scoping it to one job, writing the description that decides whether it ever loads, splitting the body into references/, writing its evals, auditing it against the rubric. NOT building a product feature (that is specify) and NOT designing an agent loop…
community
Use when building or running a persistent two-way community space — Discord, Telegram, Circle: platform choice, structure, onboarding, native→bot→human moderation, rituals, growth loops, health metrics. NOT churn of paying product customers (that is retention), NOT broadcast email (that is newsletter), NOT one live…
cpp
Use when writing, reviewing, modernizing, building, or debugging C++ - RAII and resource lifetime, smart-pointer ownership, move semantics and the Rule of Zero/Five, target-based CMake with FetchContent, and killing undefined behavior with ASan/UBSan/TSan plus clang-tidy. NOT borrow-checker / Result-Option / cargo…
gamedev-multiplayer
Use when adding multiplayer or netcode to a game — client-server vs P2P, server authority and anti-cheat, state replication vs RPCs, prediction and reconciliation, lag compensation, plus Godot 4 / Unity NGO / Unreal wiring. NOT single-player gameplay (that is godot, unity, unreal), NOT matchmaking or server hosting…