arbitrate-collision

arbitrate-collision is a skill for Claude Code from ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course. It costs 48 tokens per session (916 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A conflict resolver for two automated loops that try to change the same field on the same item at nearly the same time. It follows a chosen priority rule and records which change was rejected and why.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare proposed updates, identify field-level conflicts, choose the accepted value, and keep a record of rejected updates.
Why use it?
It prevents one change from silently overwriting another just because it happened later. It also separates real conflicts from matching changes or changes to different fields.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions Claude Code.

Good fit Use it to compare proposed updates, identify field-level conflicts, choose the accepted value, and keep a record of rejected updates.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course --skill arbitrate-collision
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for arbitrate-collision

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for arbitrate-collision

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/arbitrate-collision.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 48 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 916 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00048 $0.00916
Opus 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00366
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00183
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00092

Measured 1mo ago against content hash f8001be244e0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

arbitrate-collision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

starters/arbitration-edge/.claude/skills/arbitrate-collision/SKILL.md · 89 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

arbitrate-collision

Reads two loops' proposed writes for the same run window, checks each pair for a genuine field-level collision, and applies a stated arbitration rule to accept one write and reject the other — recording the rejection and its reason rather than letting the later write silently overwrite the earlier one.

Instructions

You are a Claude Code skill implementing the arbitration-edge pattern. Follow these steps in order:

  1. Read every proposed write from both loops for the run window. Default to the writes in this kit's README.md unless the user gives you a different pair of loops or a different run.
  2. Group proposed writes by (node, field). Two writes are only a real collision if they target the same node and the same field. Two writes to the same node but different fields are not a collision — both can be accepted independently, and neither needs arbitration.
  3. For each (node, field) group with more than one proposed write, confirm the values actually disagree. If both loops proposed the same value, accept it once and note the duplicate — this isn't a collision either, just redundant agreement.
  4. Apply the stated arbitration rule to any genuine collision. This kit's rule: a write anchored to a specific, individually verifiable event (e.g., an increment tied to a scanned return) takes precedence over a write that is an unanchored periodic snapshot, because the snapshot could already be stale by the time it lands. State the rule you applied explicitly in your report — never accept a write without naming why it won.
  5. Never silently drop the losing write. Record it in full (its loop, its proposed value, its timestamp) alongside the reason it lost. A rejected write is data — the point of this pattern is that the collision itself becomes visible, not just its outcome.
  6. Never merge or average the two colliding values. Arbitration picks one write as authoritative; it does not compute a compromise value that neither loop actually proposed.
  7. Report per (node, field) group: either "no collision" (both writes accepted, or duplicate noted) or "collision resolved" (the accepted write, the rejected write, and the rule that decided between them).

Read the full file on GitHub · 89 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 89 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A f8001be244e0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

arbitrate-collision is a skill published in the GitHub repository ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 916 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

animate

Build a web animation: whether it should animate at all, the purpose, the tool, the properties, the easing curve, the duration, interruption and exit. Writes the CSS or Motion code for dropdowns, modals, toasts, tooltips, accordions, press feedback, stagger and scroll reveals. Use to animate something or make a…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 75 tokens

building-agents

Use when building or restructuring an LLM agent — provider adapter, tool calling, structured output, RAG, agent loop, eval gate, cost routing, tracing, MCP server — model-agnostic across OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini/OSS so a model swap is a config change. NOT vector-store SQL alone (that is postgresdb) or service…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 85 tokens

fastapi

Use when building, reviewing, testing, securing or shipping a FastAPI / async Python service — routers, Pydantic v2 schemas, dependency injection, async SQLAlchemy 2.0, OAuth2/JWT, ASGITransport tests, production wiring. NOT language-level Python or packaging (that is python), NOT engine-level SQL (that is…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 94 tokens

implement

Use when an approved plan and task list exist and it is time to turn them into working, tested code — the SDD phase after analyze and before verify. Enforces TDD: a failing test comes before the code that makes it pass, one task at a time, appended to a progress ledger that survives compaction. Delegates test tooling…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 123 tokens

java

Use when writing, reviewing or refactoring modern Java (21+, 25 LTS) — records and sealed interfaces as algebraic data types, exhaustive pattern-matching switch over instanceof ladders, virtual-thread concurrency, structured concurrency and ScopedValue replacing ThreadLocal, Stream and Optional pipelines…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 89 tokens

mongodb

Use when modeling MongoDB documents (embed versus reference, the 16MB cap, bucket and subset patterns), choosing or fixing indexes (compound order by the ESR rule, partial, TTL, multikey, reading explain), writing aggregation pipelines that stay index-eligible, running multi-document transactions with retry, or…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 118 tokens