Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course --skill diff-to-graphgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-courseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/diff-to-graph)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/diff-to-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/diff-to-graph/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/diff-to-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course/diff-to-graph.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00951 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00380 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
diff-to-graph scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
diff-to-graph
Reads a diff and produces graph structure from it: a node for the change,
a node for every function or module its hunks actually touch, and a
modifies edge from the change to each. Entities the graph already
tracks get reused by id, never recreated.
Instructions
You are a Claude Code skill implementing the code-change-to-graph
pattern. Follow these steps in order:
- Read the existing graph inventory first. This tells you which functions and modules already have nodes, and under what id. Hold this list in mind before you look at the diff — you need it to tell "touched something we already track" apart from "first time we've seen this."
- Read the diff. Default to the sample diff in this kit's
README.mdunless the user gives you a different one. Parse it hunk by hunk, not just by file header — a file can have multiple hunks touching different functions inside it, and a hunk can introduce a function that didn't exist before. - List every entity actually touched by a hunk. An entity counts as touched only if a hunk changes, adds, or removes code inside it. A function or module named only in the commit message, with no corresponding hunk, does not count — don't let prose in the commit description invent an edge that the code changes themselves don't support.
- Resolve each touched entity against the inventory. If it matches an existing node (by name and containing file), reuse that node's id exactly — do not create a second node for the same entity under a new id. If it has no match, create a new node and mark it explicitly as newly created in this run, so a reviewer can see at a glance which nodes are fresh.
- Create one node for the change itself, using the commit hash or PR identifier as its id, typed as a change/commit node.
- Write one
modifiesedge per touched entity, from the change node to that entity's node (reused or newly created). Do not write an edge for the containing module file when the hunk actually touches a specific function inside it — edge the entity that changed, not everything above it in the containment hierarchy. - Report the result as: the change node id, then each touched entity
with a reused/new label, then the full list of
modifiesedges. If you deliberately excluded something the commit message mentions but no hunk supports, say so and explain why.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 59a856f53b9c
diff-to-graph is a skill published in the GitHub repository ayeshakhalid192007-dev/graph-engineering-crash-course (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 951 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Use when a green diff needs adversarial judgment in the rsc SDD chain, between verify and ship — give a review keyed to the spec/plan/constitution in 02-DOCS/wiki/sdd/, or receive one and verify each comment before agreeing. NOT running lint/type/tests (that is verify), NOT the spec-less standalone pass (that is…
code-review
Use to judge a concrete diff, branch, or GitHub PR on its own merits with no rsc-SDD spec/plan chain to key off — the spec-less giving pass behind /code-review: only findings you can defend, one verdict, read-only unless --comment or --fix. NOT the SDD gate keyed to 02-DOCS/wiki/sdd/ that also processes incoming…
simplify
Review recent code changes for reuse, code quality, and efficiency, then directly apply straightforward cleanup improvements. Use when the user wants a post-implementation cleanup pass, pre-PR polish, or asks to simplify/refine recent changes. Invoke with /simplify or /simplify .
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.