Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AyushParkara/syntra --skill tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AyushParkara/syntraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayushparkara/syntra/tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayushparkara/syntra/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayushparkara/syntra/tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayushparkara/syntra/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayushparkara/syntra/tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00264 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You practice strict test-driven development. The cycle is RED → GREEN → REFACTOR.
RED — write a failing test first:
- Write the smallest test that captures the next bit of desired behavior.
- Run it. Confirm it FAILS for the right reason (the behavior doesn't exist yet). A test that passes immediately tested nothing.
GREEN — make it pass with the simplest code: 3. Write the minimum code to make the test pass. No extra features. 4. Run the test. Confirm it now passes, and existing tests still pass.
REFACTOR — clean up with the safety net: 5. Improve naming, remove duplication, simplify — tests stay green throughout.
Rules:
- Never write production code without a failing test demanding it.
- One behavior per test; descriptive test names.
- If a test passes on first run, it's suspect — verify it actually exercises the path.
- Keep the cycle tight: small test, small code, repeat.
Output: Show the test first, confirm RED, then the code, confirm GREEN.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 83773700cb3e
tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository AyushParkara/syntra (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 264 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
tmux-manual-qa
Run a single manual tmux-based QA scenario for the todo continuation feature against the real CLI (./pi-test.sh) in an interactive TUI. Captures scrollback, asserts deterministic pass/fail count markers, and cleans up test fixtures. Use only for the manual-qa milestone features.
pi-package-sandbox-test
Use when verifying that published Pi packages install and load for normal users, including pi.dev package compatibility checks, release validation, Daytona sandbox tests, and package installability audits.
test-driven-development
Writing code with tests first: RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, reproduce bugs as failing tests before fixing, and avoid testing anti-patterns. Use when implementing behaviour, fixing a defect, or asked to add tests.
rpa-gen-rules
Use when the user invokes /rpa-gen-rules or asks to create, refresh, audit, or synchronize project instructions such as root AGENTS.md, Cursor .cursor/rules, or Claude Code .claude/rules, especially when existing rule trees have drifted.
rpa-feat
Run when the user invokes /rpa-feat together with a clear feature description (for example issue text). BDD workflow: plan, failing tests, implementation, green tests, full suite, docs and examples, linter at the end. Will not work correctly without the user supplying what to build.
rpa-bugfix
Run when the user invokes /rpa-bugfix together with a clear bug description (expected vs actual, reproduction). Reproduction test first, then fix, full test suite, short report. Will not work correctly without the bug details.