gemini-chat-and-reason

gemini-chat-and-reason is a skill for Claude Code from azmym/gemini-plugin. It costs 39 tokens per session (782 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A skill that sends questions, code, designs, or decisions to Gemini for an additional opinion or critique.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for code reviews, design critiques, sanity checks, complex decisions, and multi-step discussions with Gemini.
Why use it?
It provides another perspective that can reveal bugs, weak assumptions, or design trade-offs before a change is final.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the gemini-plugin plugin — 9 skills, 6 commands, 5 agents, 7 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it for code reviews, design critiques, sanity checks, complex decisions, and multi-step discussions with Gemini.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/azmym/gemini-plugin/gemini-chat-and-reason
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add azmym/gemini-plugin --skill gemini-chat-and-reason
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/azmym/gemini-plugin

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install gemini-plugin, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 9 skills, 6 commands, 5 agents, 7 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gemini-chat-and-reason

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/azmym/gemini-plugin/gemini-chat-and-reason/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/azmym/gemini-plugin/gemini-chat-and-reason)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/azmym/gemini-plugin/gemini-chat-and-reason"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/azmym/gemini-plugin/gemini-chat-and-reason/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gemini-chat-and-reason

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/azmym/gemini-plugin/gemini-chat-and-reason"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/azmym/gemini-plugin/gemini-chat-and-reason.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 39 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 782 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00039 $0.00782
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00391
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00156
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00078

Measured 9d ago against content hash 9acc20d92a03, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gemini-chat-and-reason scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/gemini-chat-and-reason/SKILL.md · 83 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Gemini Chat and Reason

Use this skill when you want Gemini to serve as a reasoning partner: reviewing code, critiquing a design, stress-testing a decision, or providing a second opinion on anything Claude has produced or is about to produce.

When to use this skill

  • Code review: You have written a non-trivial function or module and want a second set of eyes before committing.
  • Design critique: You are proposing an architecture, API contract, or data model and want pushback.
  • Sanity check: You are about to take an irreversible action (deploy, delete, migrate) and want confirmation the plan is sound.
  • Perspective shift: Claude's reasoning has gone deep down one path; Gemini can surface blind spots.
  • Multi-turn dialogue: You need to iterate on a draft or decision through several back-and-forth exchanges.

MCP tools

Tool Purpose
gemini_generate Single-shot text generation, best for one-off questions or reviews
gemini_chat Multi-turn conversation, best for iterative critique or dialogue

Model selection guidance

  • For routine second opinions and code reviews, use the default model (gemini-3.7-flash for chat); it is fast and cheap.
  • For complex architectural decisions or lengthy documents requiring deep reasoning, request gemini-3.1-pro-preview explicitly via the model parameter. This is already the default for gemini_generate.
  • Avoid the pro tier on short, low-stakes queries; the cost uplift is not justified.

Usage pattern

Single-shot review with gemini_generate

{
  "tool": "gemini_generate",
  "arguments": {
    "prompt": "Review the following Go function for correctness, error handling, and idiomatic style:\n\n```go\n<paste code here>\n```",
    "model": "gemini-3.7-flash"
  }
}

Multi-turn design critique with gemini_chat

Start a session, then send follow-up messages in the same session_id:

{
  "tool": "gemini_chat",
  "arguments": {
    "message": "I am designing a REST API for a payment service. Here is the proposed endpoint structure: <details>. What are the biggest risks?",
    "session_id": "payment-api-review"
  }
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 83 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 83 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 9acc20d92a03

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gemini-chat-and-reason is a skill published in the GitHub repository azmym/gemini-plugin (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 782 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

gemini-peer-review

This skill should be invoked BEFORE presenting implementation plans, architecture recommendations, code review findings, or answers to broad technical questions. Use proactively when about to "recommend", "suggest", "propose", "design", "plan", or answer "how should", "what's the best way", "which approach". MANDATORY…

slb350/gemini-peer-review · 84 tokens

review-loop

Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified"…

sangrokjung/claude-forge · 100 tokens

red-team-review

Unified adversarial review: v4.3 Strategic Matrix (MTA-004). 7-phase framework: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA Decision Engine → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Executive Summary. Absorbs: bias-detector.

winstonkoh87/Athena-Public · 65 tokens

openclaw-github-dedupe

Investigate a cluster of GitHub issues and PRs, determine canonical candidates, post duplicate/related status, preserve contributor credit, and execute cleanup actions. Supports autonomous mode for provided-link-only closeout, merge/fix follow-through, changelog, and post-merge issue/PR cleanup.

vincentkoc/dotskills · 68 tokens

procoder

Work like a senior developer in a repository governed by procoder: run the commit gate before calling anything done, format and lint through the binary, and drive the spec, plan, todo, backlog, and sprint chain in .procoder/. Use this skill when the repository contains a .procoder/ directory or an AGENTS.md naming…

azrtydxb/procoder · 101 tokens

code-review

The depth half of a review - the dimensions a diff is read against (correctness, boundaries, concurrency, failure paths, secrets, data access, structure, test quality) and the rule that a finding is refuted before it is reported. The verdict stays with the reviewer agent. Use when reviewing a diff or a pull request…

jjanczur/tyran · 80 tokens