Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Kingdaddy007/my-os --skill review-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kingdaddy007/my-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingdaddy007/my-os/review-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingdaddy007/my-os/review-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kingdaddy007/my-os/review-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingdaddy007/my-os/review-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kingdaddy007/my-os/review-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00140 | $0.02364 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00056 | $0.00946 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00473 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00236 |
Grade A, and why
CODE REVIEW & QUALITY AUDITING scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 280 lines · 140 tokens per session scan A 151968303d17
CODE REVIEW & QUALITY AUDITING is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kingdaddy007/my-os (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 140 tokens to every session and 2,364 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review, two modes. Strategic Matrix v4.3 (MTA-004) for arguments/plans/decisions: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Summary. Deliverable Audit for built artefacts (assignments, reports, code outputs): isolated fresh-context hunt against the brief…
decision-journal
Unified decision lifecycle: Pre-decision logging, post-decision review, failure classification, and calibration tracking. Absorbs: post-mortem-engine.
gemini-chat-and-reason
Get a second opinion from Gemini via text generation or multi-turn chat. Use for code review, design critique, sanity-checking before commit, or when Claude wants another perspective on a complex decision.
sonic-review-architecture
Sonic Cursor Skill: Review Android changes against Clean Architecture, MVI, module boundaries, and project rules. Use when reviewing PRs, refactors, or asking if code follows architecture standards. Prefer sonic-review-complete for a full multi-check pass.
sonicg-review-architecture
OrbitalSonic Gemini Skill: Review Android changes against Clean Architecture, MVI, module boundaries, and project rules. Use when reviewing PRs, refactors, or asking if code follows architecture standards. Prefer sonicg-review-complete for a full multi-check pass.
sonicc-review-architecture
OrbitalSonic Claude Skill: Review Android changes against Clean Architecture, MVI, module boundaries, and project rules. Use when reviewing PRs, refactors, or asking if code follows architecture standards. Prefer sonicc-review-complete for a full multi-check pass.