Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/backnotprop/plannotator/update-depsnpx skills add backnotprop/plannotator --skill update-depsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/backnotprop/plannotatorWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.01678 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00839 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00336 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
update-deps scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 190 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Update Dependencies
Audit outdated packages, verify supply chain integrity, bump what's safe, defer what needs review, and log everything.
This process has three phases: discovery, integrity audit, and execution. The integrity audit is the most important — every package gets checked before it touches the lockfile.
Phase 1: Discovery
Run bun outdated to get the full list of packages with available updates.
bun outdated
Parse the output into a structured list. For each package, note:
- Package name
- Current version
- Available update version
- Whether it's age-gated (indicated by
*in the output — the footnote "The * indicates that version isn't true latest due to minimum release age" confirms this) - Whether it's a runtime dep, dev dep, or peer dep
Also check whether any packages are blocked entirely by the age gate (like @pierre/diffs was when its minimum semver range couldn't resolve). Flag these separately — they may need minimumReleaseAgeExcludes in bunfig.toml.
Phase 2: Integrity Audit
This is the core of the process. Spawn one Sonnet sub-agent per package to run the integrity check in parallel. Sonnet is used here because these are independent, structured verification tasks that don't need heavier reasoning.
Each sub-agent receives the package name, current version, and target version, and performs the following checks:
Sub-agent prompt template
For each outdated package, spawn a Sonnet agent with this task:
You are auditing the npm package "{package}" for a version bump from {current} to {target}.
Run these checks and report back with a JSON object:
1. **Maintainer verification**: Check if maintainers changed between versions.
npm view {package}@{current} maintainers --json
npm view {package}@{target} maintainers --json
Compare the two lists. Flag any additions or removals.
2. **Publish date and age**: Get the publish timestamp.
npm view {package} time --json
Extract the date for version {target}. Calculate days since publication.
Flag if younger than 7 days.
3. **Provenance**: Check if the package has registry signatures or attestations.
npm audit signatures (if not already run this session)
Note whether the package has provenance attestations.
4. **Tarball diff**: Show what actually changed in the published package.
npm diff --diff={package}@{current} --diff={package}@{target}
Summarize the changes:
- How many files changed
- Are changes limited to version bumps, deps, and rebuilt dist? Or are there meaningful source changes?
- Any new runtime dependencies added?
- Any suspicious patterns (obfuscated code, eval(), network calls in unexpected places)
5. **Release notes**: Try to find what changed.
Check the package's repository for release notes or changelog:
npm view {package}@{target} repository.url
gh release view v{target} --repo <owner/repo> (try with and without v prefix)
Summarize the changelog if found.
Report your findings as JSON:
{{
"package": "{package}",
"from": "{current}",
"to": "{target}",
"age_days": <number>,
"maintainers_changed": <boolean>,
"maintainers_added": [],
"maintainers_removed": [],
"provenance": <boolean>,
"new_runtime_deps": [],
"files_changed": <number>,
"has_source_changes": <boolean>,
"changelog_summary": "<brief summary>",
"suspicious_patterns": [],
"verdict": "safe" | "review" | "defer",
"verdict_reason": "<one sentence explanation>"
}}
Verdict guidelines:
- "safe": Same maintainers, no new runtime deps, changes match what changelog describes, no suspicious patterns
- "review": Minor concerns (e.g., new maintainer who is clearly from the same org, small new dep from known publisher)
- "defer": Maintainer changes from unknown accounts, new runtime deps with unclear purpose, suspicious code patterns, substantive API changes that need integration testing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 190 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 55904cb4d709
update-deps is a skill published in the GitHub repository backnotprop/plannotator (8,341 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,678 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cache-notes
Fetch & embed AI transcripts as Obsidian callouts. Args: , all, refresh . Prompts for URLs if empty.
recap
Produce a weekly/date-range recap from emails, Slack, Jira/Confluence, and vault notes. Args: [dates]. Default = this week.
fill-participants
Resolve and fill Participants frontmatter + link unlinked names in body. Args: , all.
followup-todos
Extract action items as plain markdown bullets (with confirmation). Args: . No args = run /note-status pending --step=todos.
meeting
Create or wrap meeting notes. Args: {title} [folder=X], wrap , wrap pending [today|this week|dates]. No args = pick from Google Calendar.
note-status
Verify meeting notes are fully processed. Args: , [dates], all, pending [dates] [--step=X]. Shows which wrap steps are complete or missing.