Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills --skill ai-sre-incident-responsegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/ai-sre-incident-response)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/ai-sre-incident-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/ai-sre-incident-response/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/ai-sre-incident-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/ai-sre-incident-response.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 145 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.02702 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01351 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00540 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00270 |
Grade A, and why
ai-sre-incident-response scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://api.provider.com/health How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 312 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI SRE Incident Response
Apply SRE rigor to AI systems where incidents include quality regressions, unsafe outputs, and budget explosions.
When to Use This Skill
- An LLM endpoint begins returning degraded or hallucinated answers
- Token spend spikes beyond budget thresholds
- A model provider goes down and traffic must fail over
- Safety guardrails fire at abnormal rates
- A new model deployment causes latency or accuracy regression
Prerequisites
- Prometheus and Alertmanager deployed with scrape targets for AI services
- Grafana dashboards for golden signals (latency, error rate, cost, quality)
- On-call rotation configured in PagerDuty, Opsgenie, or equivalent
- Runbook repository accessible to responders
- Rollback mechanism for model and prompt versions (GitOps or feature flags)
AI Incident Classes
- Availability incident: model/provider unavailable, timeout storm.
- Quality incident: answer accuracy or tool success drops below SLO.
- Safety incident: harmful or policy-violating outputs increase.
- Cost incident: unexpected token or provider spend spike.
Severity Framework
| Severity | Criteria | Response Time | Notification |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEV1 | User-facing outage, compliance risk, data leak | 5 min | Page on-call + incident commander |
| SEV2 | Major degradation in key flows | 15 min | Page on-call |
| SEV3 | Limited impact or internal-only issue | 1 hour | Slack alert |
| SEV4 | Cosmetic or low-priority regression | Next business day | Ticket |
Golden Signals for AI Services
- Request success rate
- Latency (queue + generation + tool execution)
- Hallucination/groundedness proxy metrics
- Cost per minute and per tenant
- Guardrail violation rate
Prometheus Alert Rules
# prometheus-ai-alerts.yaml
groups:
- name: ai-service-alerts
rules:
- alert: ModelEndpointDown
expr: up{job="llm-inference"} == 0
for: 2m
labels:
severity: sev1
annotations:
summary: "LLM inference endpoint {{ $labels.instance }} is down"
runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/model-outage"
- alert: HighHallucinationRate
expr: |
rate(llm_hallucination_detected_total[10m])
/ rate(llm_requests_total[10m]) > 0.15
for: 5m
labels:
severity: sev2
annotations:
summary: "Hallucination rate above 15% for {{ $labels.model }}"
runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/quality-regression"
- alert: TokenCostExplosion
expr: |
sum(rate(llm_token_cost_dollars[5m])) by (tenant)
> 0.50
for: 3m
labels:
severity: sev2
annotations:
summary: "Token spend exceeds $0.50/min for tenant {{ $labels.tenant }}"
runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/cost-spike"
- alert: LatencyP95Exceeded
expr: |
histogram_quantile(0.95,
rate(llm_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])
) > 5
for: 5m
labels:
severity: sev2
annotations:
summary: "LLM p95 latency exceeds 5s for {{ $labels.service }}"
- alert: GuardrailViolationSpike
expr: |
rate(llm_guardrail_violations_total[10m])
/ rate(llm_requests_total[10m]) > 0.05
for: 5m
labels:
severity: sev1
annotations:
summary: "Guardrail violations above 5% for {{ $labels.model }}"
runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/safety-incident"
- alert: ModelQualityDrop
expr: |
llm_eval_score{metric="groundedness"} < 0.70
for: 10m
labels:
severity: sev2
annotations:
summary: "Groundedness score dropped below 0.70 for {{ $labels.model }}"
- alert: ProviderErrorRateHigh
expr: |
rate(llm_provider_errors_total[5m])
/ rate(llm_provider_requests_total[5m]) > 0.10
for: 3m
labels:
severity: sev2
annotations:
summary: "Provider {{ $labels.provider }} error rate above 10%"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 312 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 5ac51b898d05
ai-sre-incident-response is a skill published in the GitHub repository BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills (1,081 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 2,702 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
automated-remediation
An automated recovery procedure that selects a predefined runbook for a known service-failure pattern. A runbook is a documented sequence of operational recovery steps.
root-cause-analysis
An incident investigation tool that gathers metrics, logs, events, and change history to identify likely root causes. It connects related events on a timeline and produces a root-cause analysis report.
incident-response
An incident-response process that receives CloudWatch or Prometheus alerts, classifies their severity, consults runbooks, investigates possible causes, and prepares remediation for approval.
deslop
Remove AI-generated artifacts from code. Three-phase certainty-graded cleanup. Use after any AI implementation session or before PR creation.
rust-trait-object-layout
Rust trait object layout — DST fat pointers, vtable placement, generic last-field coercion surprise.
rubber-duck
Rubber duck debugging: explain the problem to a non-expert (or inanimate object) step by step.