Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills --skill load-balancinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/load-balancing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/load-balancing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/load-balancing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/load-balancing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/load-balancing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 9 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 206 Tool calls are chained to bypass individual safety checks or escalate capabilities beyond what any single tool call would allow.Fix: Limit tool chaining depth and validate the output of each tool before passing it to the next. Require explicit user approval for multi-step chains.
- high Tool Misuse · line 209 Tool calls are chained to bypass individual safety checks or escalate capabilities beyond what any single tool call would allow.Fix: Limit tool chaining depth and validate the output of each tool before passing it to the next. Require explicit user approval for multi-step chains.
- high Tool Misuse · line 212 Tool calls are chained to bypass individual safety checks or escalate capabilities beyond what any single tool call would allow.Fix: Limit tool chaining depth and validate the output of each tool before passing it to the next. Require explicit user approval for multi-step chains.
- high Tool Misuse · line 215 Tool calls are chained to bypass individual safety checks or escalate capabilities beyond what any single tool call would allow.Fix: Limit tool chaining depth and validate the output of each tool before passing it to the next. Require explicit user approval for multi-step chains.
- medium Privilege Escalation · line 203 Commands invoke sudo or root privileges. Verify this elevated access is necessary and justified.Fix: Avoid sudo/root unless strictly required. Prefer least-privilege patterns. If elevation is needed, document the justification and scope.
- medium Privilege Escalation · line 206 Commands invoke sudo or root privileges. Verify this elevated access is necessary and justified.Fix: Avoid sudo/root unless strictly required. Prefer least-privilege patterns. If elevation is needed, document the justification and scope.
- medium Privilege Escalation · line 209 Commands invoke sudo or root privileges. Verify this elevated access is necessary and justified.Fix: Avoid sudo/root unless strictly required. Prefer least-privilege patterns. If elevation is needed, document the justification and scope.
- medium Privilege Escalation · line 212 Commands invoke sudo or root privileges. Verify this elevated access is necessary and justified.Fix: Avoid sudo/root unless strictly required. Prefer least-privilege patterns. If elevation is needed, document the justification and scope.
- medium Privilege Escalation · line 215 Commands invoke sudo or root privileges. Verify this elevated access is necessary and justified.Fix: Avoid sudo/root unless strictly required. Prefer least-privilege patterns. If elevation is needed, document the justification and scope.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.03104 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01552 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00621 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00310 |
Grade B, and why
load-balancing scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks for rootmediumPrivilege escalation
A mod that escalates privileges can change anything on the machine, not only the project.
sudo systemctl reload haproxy How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 388 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Load Balancing
Distribute traffic across application servers for high availability, scalability, and fault tolerance.
When to Use
- Distributing HTTP/HTTPS traffic across multiple backend servers.
- Implementing health checks to route around unhealthy instances.
- Terminating TLS at the load balancer for simplified certificate management.
- Enabling blue/green or canary deployments with traffic shifting.
- Scaling horizontally behind a single entry point.
Prerequisites
- Two or more backend servers running the same application.
- TLS certificate for HTTPS termination (ACM, Let's Encrypt, or self-signed for internal).
- For AWS: VPC with public and private subnets across availability zones.
- For nginx/HAProxy: Linux server with root access.
nginx Load Balancer
Basic Round-Robin
# /etc/nginx/conf.d/loadbalancer.conf
upstream app_backend {
server 10.0.1.10:8080;
server 10.0.1.11:8080;
server 10.0.1.12:8080;
}
server {
listen 80;
server_name app.example.com;
return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
}
server {
listen 443 ssl http2;
server_name app.example.com;
ssl_certificate /etc/ssl/certs/app.example.com.pem;
ssl_certificate_key /etc/ssl/private/app.example.com-key.pem;
ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3;
ssl_ciphers HIGH:!aNULL:!MD5;
location / {
proxy_pass http://app_backend;
proxy_set_header Host $host;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
proxy_connect_timeout 5s;
proxy_read_timeout 30s;
proxy_send_timeout 30s;
}
location /health {
access_log off;
return 200 "OK";
}
}
Weighted and Backup Servers
upstream app_backend {
least_conn; # Route to server with fewest active connections
server 10.0.1.10:8080 weight=5; # Gets 5x traffic
server 10.0.1.11:8080 weight=3; # Gets 3x traffic
server 10.0.1.12:8080 weight=1; # Gets 1x traffic
server 10.0.1.20:8080 backup; # Only used when others are down
server 10.0.1.21:8080 down; # Temporarily removed from pool
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 388 lines · 26 tokens per session scan B d71115181a13
load-balancing is a skill published in the GitHub repository BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills (1,084 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 3,104 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (asks for root). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementing-aws-config-rules-for-compliance
Implementing AWS Config rules for continuous compliance monitoring of AWS resources, deploying managed and custom rules aligned to CIS and PCI DSS frameworks, configuring automatic remediation with SSM Automation, and aggregating compliance data across accounts.
ec2
AWS EC2 virtual machine management — instances, security groups, key pairs, AMIs, EBS volumes, Auto Scaling Groups, Spot Instances, Session Manager, placement groups, and instance lifecycle automation. Trigger on ANY of these, even when EC2 isn't named explicitly: - Launching or provisioning: "spin up a server"…
eventbridge
AWS EventBridge serverless event bus for event-driven architectures. Use when creating rules, configuring event patterns, setting up scheduled events, integrating with SaaS, or building cross-account event routing.
s3
AWS S3 object storage for bucket management, object operations, and access control. Use when creating buckets, uploading files, configuring lifecycle policies, setting up static websites, managing permissions, or implementing cross-region replication.
sqs
AWS SQS message queue service for decoupled architectures. Use when creating queues, configuring dead-letter queues, managing visibility timeouts, implementing FIFO ordering, or integrating with Lambda.
dynamodb
Use when modeling or operating a DynamoDB table: deriving partition/sort keys from access patterns, single-table vs table-per-entity, adding a GSI/LSI, on-demand vs provisioned capacity, or diagnosing hot-partition throttling. NOT relational schema/SQL/EXPLAIN (that is postgresdb), NOT aggregation-pipeline document…