Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BambooGap/skills-orchestrator --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BambooGap/skills-orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bamboogap/skills-orchestrator/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bamboogap/skills-orchestrator/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bamboogap/skills-orchestrator/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bamboogap/skills-orchestrator/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bamboogap/skills-orchestrator/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00060 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00030 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00012 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
Reference Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Reference Review
Use this Claude Skill entrypoint to verify adapter inspection can detect valid Claude-style skill
bundles. The canonical SkillOps metadata still lives in config/skills.yaml and skills/*.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 9 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 27edaa122287
Reference Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository BambooGap/skills-orchestrator (4 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 60 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
harness-loop
The §5 autonomous-improvement-loop procedure specialized to this harness's own reviewer prompts (agents/code-reviewer.md + agents/security-reviewer.md) — the mission-specific 9-step regulation layered on skills/loop's generic mechanics. NOT for an arbitrary mission (use /loop for that), and NOT for editing…
codeql
Operational skill for CodeQL: enabling GitHub analysis, writing/using queries, interpreting SARIF, and fixing true positives in PRs.
github-comment
Add a comment to a GitHub issue or pull request.
pr-review-triage
Use for a Codex PR Babysitter triage loop that monitors PR aging, CI blocks, reviewer threads, and lightweight action proposals with isolated-worktree fix candidates and human escalation for risky changes.
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.