Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to banshee-data/velocity.report. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/banshee-data/velocity.report/main/.claude/skills/security-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/banshee-data/velocity.reportWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/banshee-data/velocity.report/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/banshee-data/velocity.report/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/banshee-data/velocity.report/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/banshee-data/velocity.report/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/banshee-data/velocity.report/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01228 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00491 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00246 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: security-review
Run a structured security review. Produces severity-rated findings with exploit steps, impact, and remediation. Uses Malory's methodology.
Usage
/security-review
/security-review internal/api/
/security-review internal/lidar/
/security-review internal/report/
/security-review all
Without an argument, reviews all changed files (from git diff --stat).
Procedure
1. Identify scope
If a path or area is given, focus there. Otherwise:
git diff --stat HEAD
git diff --name-only HEAD
Identify which subsystems are touched: radar, lidar, API, PDF generator, web, config.
2. Static analysis pass
Work through subsystems in priority order:
- Input parsing functions: highest risk
- Database operations
- File I/O
- Network handlers
- Config parsing
For each area, check:
- Input validation: high-risk parse points include radar JSON parsing (
internal/radar/), LiDAR UDP packet parsing (internal/lidar/), serial command handling, API request bodies (oversized payloads, malformed JSON, path traversal), config file parsing. Test mentally with: overflows, negatives, special characters, null bytes, UTF-8 edge cases, injection payloads. - Auth & access: is API authentication implemented and enforced on every route? Are privilege levels checked? Can an unauthenticated user reach sensor data? Are default credentials present?
- Privacy guarantees: verify these claims hold (they are the project's core promise):
- No licence plate data collected
- No camera/video recording
- No PII in database
- Data stays local
- Then look for what the claims don't cover: timing-based vehicle re-identification, metadata leakage (sensor location in exports), PII in debug logs or error messages, data correlation with external sources.
- Code execution vectors: Typst/template-data injection in PDF generation, shell commands in scripts, deserialisation, template injection, local privilege escalation via systemd misconfig, suid binaries, file permission gaps.
- Denial of service: API request flooding, large payloads, database disk exhaustion, memory exhaustion via sensor data streams, CPU-heavy queries, crash paths via malformed sensor data, invalid queries, null derefs, uncaught panics.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 143 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A f0ac8d5216ca
security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository banshee-data/velocity.report (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,228 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-25.
security-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| security-reviewbanshee-data/velocity.report | Skill | 11 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidentsmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | Skill | 36k | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 91 | Claude Code |
| analyzing-network-packets-with-scapymukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | Skill | 36k | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 75 | Claude Code |
| analyzing-network-traffic-with-wiresharkmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | Skill | 36k | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | B | 49 | Claude Code |
| whitebox-toolsznlgis/opengis-skills | Skill | 76 | 10d ago | MIT | A | 119 | Claude Code, Codex |
| performing-network-packet-capture-analysisxalgorix/xalgorix | Skill | 1.3k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | C | 62 | Claude Code, Codex |
| pdalznlgis/opengis-skills | Skill | 76 | 10d ago | MIT | B | 90 | Claude Code, Codex |