basic-memory: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/pr-review-loop/SKILL.md

pr-review-loop is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from basicmachines-co/basic-memory. It costs 92 tokens per session (3,074 once invoked), scanned A, original, AGPL-3.0.

A set of instructions for following a GitHub pull request review loop before merging. A pull request is a proposed code change that others review on GitHub.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when preparing to merge, squash-merge, or auto-merge a pull request, monitoring review comments, addressing feedback, or waiting for approval.
Why use it?
It helps ensure review comments are handled and required approval is present before the change is merged. It also covers cases such as marking a pull request ready or enabling automatic merging.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Which agent this was written for is unclear — body not stored (licence); the path alone says nothing. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is basicmachines-co/basic-memory's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on basic-memory itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything basic-memory configures →

About the project

Basic Memory is a local-first knowledge system that stores notes as Markdown files and connects them into a searchable knowledge graph for AI conversations. People and AI assistants use it to preserve project context across Claude, Codex, Cursor, ChatGPT, and other MCP-compatible clients. The catalogue add-ons provide Basic Memory skills, commands, instructions, MCP integrations, hooks, settings, and a plugin.

basicmachines-co/basic-memory · 4,251 stars · on GitHub · basicmemory.com

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to basicmachines-co/basic-memory. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/basicmachines-co/basic-memory/main/.agents/skills/pr-review-loop/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/basicmachines-co/basic-memory

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pr-review-loop

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/basicmachines-co/basic-memory/pr-review-loop/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/basicmachines-co/basic-memory/pr-review-loop)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/basicmachines-co/basic-memory/pr-review-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/basicmachines-co/basic-memory/pr-review-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pr-review-loop

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/basicmachines-co/basic-memory/pr-review-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/basicmachines-co/basic-memory/pr-review-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 92 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,074 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00092 $0.03074
Opus 5.5 $0.00037 $0.01230
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00615
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00307

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 60a2c4452cd8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pr-review-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/pr-review-loop/SKILL.md · 308 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed AGPL-3.0

The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 308 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 60a2c4452cd8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pr-review-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository basicmachines-co/basic-memory (4,251 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 3,074 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.