Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kortix-ai/suna --skill flag-cleanupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kortix-ai/sunaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kortix-ai/suna/flag-cleanup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kortix-ai/suna/flag-cleanup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kortix-ai/suna/flag-cleanup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kortix-ai/suna/flag-cleanup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kortix-ai/suna/flag-cleanup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 53 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.02407 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01203 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00481 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00241 |
Grade A, and why
flag-cleanup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 215 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A a55db8eebc20
flag-cleanup is a skill published in the GitHub repository kortix-ai/suna (20,180 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,407 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
lean-review
CocoLean diff-scoped over-engineering audit — scans uncommitted git diff and applies five classification tags (delete/stdlib/native/yagni/shrink) to identify unnecessary surface area before commit.
github-commenting
How to post clean, rich, deduplicated GitHub PR review comments — suggestion blocks, multi-line anchors, markers, formatting rules. Load before posting or fixing any PR comment.
code-changes
Change the user's own program, on their machine or through GitHub. Use when a request needs a change to the user's code (instrument tracing, wire the SDK, fix the agent behind a failing scenario, add a run parameter to a connected agent, version a hardcoded prompt) and not when the platform alone can do it (create a…
open-pr-fix
Act on the findings a review left on a PR or MR: take or decline each by severity, edit the code, one commit, reply. Use when handed a PR or MR URL that has already been reviewed. Edits real code.
vanellus
Skill "vanellus" from markmhendrickson/ateles, covering vanellus — pr steward, identity, principals, core job and automated pr review (swarm-panel invocation).
github
GitHub operations via gh CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available)…