Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Bbeierle12/Skill-MCP-Claude --skill writing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Bbeierle12/Skill-MCP-ClaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bbeierle12/skill-mcp-claude/writing-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bbeierle12/skill-mcp-claude/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bbeierle12/skill-mcp-claude/writing-plans/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bbeierle12/skill-mcp-claude/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bbeierle12/skill-mcp-claude/writing-plans.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 155 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00770 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00385 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
writing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 157 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing Plans
Core Principle
Write plans clear enough for an enthusiastic junior engineer with poor taste, no judgement, no project context, and an aversion to testing to follow.
Plan Structure
Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
> **For Claude:** Use executing-plans skill to implement this plan task-by-task.
## Overview
Brief description of what we're building and why.
## Prerequisites
- [ ] Dependency 1 installed
- [ ] Service 2 running
- [ ] Access to X configured
## Tasks
### Task 1: [Descriptive Name]
**File:** `path/to/file.ts`
**Test:** `path/to/file.test.ts`
#### Test First (RED)
```typescript
// Exact test code to write
describe('FeatureName', () => {
it('should do specific thing', () => {
// Arrange
// Act
// Assert
});
});
Implementation (GREEN)
// Exact implementation code
export function featureName() {
// Implementation
}
Verification
npm test -- --grep "FeatureName"
# Expected: 1 passing
Task 2: [Next Task]
...
Integration Tests
After all tasks complete:
# Commands to run
npm run test:integration
Manual Verification
Steps to manually verify the feature works:
- Step 1
- Step 2
- Expected result
Rollback Plan
If something goes wrong:
git revert HEAD- ...
## Plan Quality Checklist
### Every Task Must Have:
- [ ] Exact file paths
- [ ] Complete code (not "add validation")
- [ ] Test written BEFORE implementation
- [ ] Verification command with expected output
- [ ] Clear success criteria
### Plan Must Include:
- [ ] Prerequisites listed
- [ ] Tasks in dependency order
- [ ] Integration test at end
- [ ] Rollback instructions
## Writing Guidelines
### Be Explicit
❌ "Add error handling"
✅ "Wrap the API call in try/catch, log errors with context, return null on failure"
### Be Complete
❌ "Update the config"
✅ ```json
{
"setting": "value",
"newSetting": "newValue"
}
Be Ordered
Tasks should be executable in sequence:
- No forward dependencies
- Each task builds on previous
- Tests pass after each task
Execution Handoff
After saving the plan, offer execution choice:
"Plan complete and saved. Two execution options:
1. Subagent-Driven (this session)
- Fresh subagent per task
- Review between tasks
- Fast iteration
2. Parallel Session (separate)
- Open new session with executing-plans skill
- Batch execution with checkpoints
Which approach?"
DRY, YAGNI, TDD Reminders
Include at top of every plan:
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 157 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 91a26dde5fee
writing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository Bbeierle12/Skill-MCP-Claude (8 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 770 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
flask-werkzeug-attack
Exploit Flask/Werkzeug debugger exposure for traceback and SECRET leaks.
flask-expert
Expert-level Flask web development, REST APIs, extensions, and production deployment. Use when the user mentions Python, web framework, REST APIs, or Jinja2, or when the task involves Flask Fundamentals or Flask Extensions.
fast-dash
Build a Fast Dash web app from a Python function. Use when the user wants to turn a function into an interactive app, add a UI to an existing function, or build a dashboard / form / wizard. Fast Dash infers UI components from type hints, so a well-typed function becomes an app with one decorator.
flask
Flask - Lightweight Python web framework for microservices, REST APIs, and flexible web applications with extensive extension ecosystem.
flask
Build Flask applications with app factories, blueprints, JSON or Jinja responses, extensions, and pytest checks.
flask
Flask - Lightweight Python web framework for microservices, REST APIs, and flexible web applications with extensive extension ecosystem.