Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add beita6969/ScienceClaw --skill regulatory-draftinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/beita6969/ScienceClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/regulatory-drafting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/regulatory-drafting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/regulatory-drafting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/regulatory-drafting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/beita6969/scienceclaw/regulatory-drafting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00236 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
regulatory-drafting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
name: 'regulatory-drafting' description: 'Regulatory Drafting agent for healthcare workflows.' measurable_outcome: Execute skill workflow successfully with valid output within 15 minutes. allowed-tools:
- read_file
- run_shell_command
Regulatory Drafting
This skill implements the Regulatory Drafting workflow using Anthropic's Claude.
Usage
python3 Skills/Anthropic_Health_Stack/Regulatory_Drafting/coworker.py
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 40 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 445e34181b02
regulatory-drafting is a skill published in the GitHub repository beita6969/ScienceClaw (898 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 236 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
analytical-method-validation
Plan, execute, and document validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP / / , ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays…
auditing-deidentification-runs
Produce a signed, reproducible, no-PHI audit trail for an OpenMed de-identification run via deidentify(audit=True). Use when the user needs compliance evidence, a tamper-evident record of what was redacted and why, to verify nothing was changed, to retain proof for HIPAA/GDPR audits, or to review de-id decisions…
pseudonymizing-for-gdpr
Apply GDPR-grade pseudonymization to clinical or personal text with OpenMed, keeping a separately-held re-linkage key so the data can be controlled-re-linked later. Use when the user must process EU personal/health data under GDPR, asks for pseudonymization vs anonymization, needs Art. 4(5) / Art. 9 / Recital 26…
validating-us-core
Validate FHIR R4 resources and Bundles against US Core / USCDI profiles with the official HL7 FHIR validator before submitting to an EHR. Covers running validatorcli.jar (or the public validator.fhir.org), declaring meta.profile, must-support elements, common conformance gaps (missing code/category/status), and…
fda-database
Query openFDA API for drugs, devices, adverse events, recalls, regulatory submissions (510k, PMA), substance identification (UNII), for FDA regulatory data analysis and safety research.
scanpy
Standard single-cell RNA-seq analysis pipeline. Use for QC, normalization, dimensionality reduction (PCA/UMAP/t-SNE), clustering, differential expression, and visualization. Best for exploratory scRNA-seq analysis with established workflows. For deep learning models use scvi-tools; for data format questions use…