What is mpga-review-pr?

A pull request review that combines checks for code quality, bugs, security, and—when relevant—user-interface quality.

Use it to inspect a pull request or branch and decide whether the changes are ready to merge.

It gives one review covering logic errors, edge cases, security risks, accessibility, responsive behavior, and design consistency.

mpga-review-pr — Skill for Claude Code by benrben/MPGA

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add benrben/MPGA --skill review-pr

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/benrben/MPGA

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install mpga, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 18 skills, 26 commands, 3 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benrben/mpga/review-pr/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/benrben/mpga/review-pr)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benrben/mpga/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benrben/mpga/review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/benrben/mpga/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/benrben/mpga/review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 1,726 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00034	$0.01726
Opus 5.5	$0.00014	$0.00690
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00007	$0.00345
Haiku 4.5	$0.00003	$0.00173

Measured 2mo ago against content hash a8c59ada45ee, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

mpga-review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

mpga-plugin/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md · 136 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

review-pr

A PR lands. Time to INSPECT it. Nobody reviews code better than us, believe me. Other reviewers skim the diff and call it a day — Sad! We go DEEP, we go WIDE, and we catch EVERYTHING. Evidence First.

Trigger: User wants a comprehensive PR review, code review, or merge readiness check. Also triggered by: "review this PR", "review my changes", "is this ready to merge", "code review", "PR review".

Delegation

We deploy THREE core agents — reviewer, bug-hunter, security-auditor — and a FOURTH ui-auditor when the PR touches UI files. The BEST review team ever assembled. While lesser tools send one lonely linter, we unleash a FULL SQUAD. Total coverage. No stone unturned. Tremendous.

reviewer agent — code quality, style, architecture
bug-hunter agent — correctness, logic errors, edge cases
security-auditor agent — security vulnerabilities, secrets, injection risks
ui-auditor agent — UI quality, accessibility, responsive behavior, and design-system compliance when the diff contains UI files

Protocol

Read PR diff — first we get the intel, and we get ALL of it:
- If PR number given: gh pr diff <number>
- If branch specified: git diff <base-branch>...<feature-branch>
- If no args: git diff main...HEAD (or default base branch)
- Also read the full file context for changed files — diffs alone miss surrounding context. We don't do HALF measures.
Spawn reviewer agent (read-only) for code quality — this agent has INCREDIBLE taste:
- Code style consistency with project conventions
- Architecture alignment — does this change fit the existing patterns?
- Naming clarity and API design
- Test coverage — are new code paths tested?
- Documentation — are public APIs documented?
- Commit hygiene — are commits atomic and well-messaged?
- DRY violations — is there copy-pasted logic? Copy-paste is for LOSERS.
Spawn bug-hunter agent (read-only) in parallel for correctness — the best bug-hunter you've ever seen, a real KILLER:
- Logic errors in new/changed code
- Edge cases not handled (null, empty, boundary values)
- Error handling gaps (missing try/catch, unhandled promise rejections)
- Race conditions in async code
- Type safety issues (implicit any, unsafe casts)
- Regression risks — does this change break existing behavior?
- Off-by-one errors in loops/slicing — very sneaky, but WE CATCH THEM

Read the full file on GitHub · 136 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

2mo ago First seen · 136 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A a8c59ada45ee

Subscribe to this mod's changes

mpga-review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository benrben/MPGA (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,726 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Code review Security

mpga-review-pr next to 6 skills from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
mpga-review-prbenrben/MPGA	Skill	5	7mo ago	MIT	A	34	Claude Code
autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub	Skill	9.6k	today	MIT	A	17	Claude Code, Codex
omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes	Skill	5.5k	today	MIT	A	49	Claude Code, Codex
agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills	Skill	2.2k	6d ago	MIT	A	115	Claude Code, Codex
revdiff-planumputun/revdiff	Skill	953	today	MIT	A	84	Claude Code
re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin	Skill	1.4k	yesterday	MIT	A	51	Claude Code, Codex
explore-unknownsdzhng/skills	Skill	1.5k	today	MIT	A	162	Claude Code, Codex