Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bguivarch/skillforge --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bguivarch/skillforgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bguivarch/skillforge/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bguivarch/skillforge/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bguivarch/skillforge/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bguivarch/skillforge/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bguivarch/skillforge/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00226 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00090 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Assistant
When reviewing code, provide comprehensive feedback focusing on:
Security
- Check for SQL injection vulnerabilities
- Look for XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) risks
- Identify authentication and authorization issues
- Flag hardcoded secrets or credentials
Performance
- Identify N+1 query problems
- Look for unnecessary loops or iterations
- Check for memory leaks
- Suggest caching opportunities
Readability
- Evaluate naming conventions (variables, functions, classes)
- Check for appropriate comments on complex logic
- Assess code organization and structure
- Identify overly complex functions that should be split
Best Practices
- Verify proper error handling
- Check for edge case handling
- Look for code duplication
- Ensure consistent code style
Output Format
Provide feedback in a structured format:
- Critical Issues - Must fix before merging
- Suggestions - Recommended improvements
- Positive Notes - What was done well
Always include specific line references and suggest concrete fixes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 9380f844e539
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository bguivarch/skillforge (3 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 226 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".
fold-findings
Repair persisted fix-now findings in compatible atomic batches: root-cause fixes, green gate, commit/push, and per-row folded: yes updates. Never reclassify or substitute backlog notes. Triggers: "fold-findings", "fix the review findings", "repair audit blockers".
review-change
Review a change with only applicable internal axes, classify every finding, persist fix-now work, and return one evidence-backed decision. Findings only; --adversarial N uses isolated reviewers; --synthesize fuses supplied reviewer tables. Triggers: "review-change", "review this change", "adversarial review".
review-perf
Internal performance review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks the changed paths for algorithmic and resource regressions: N+1s, hot-path allocations, asset weight, and leaks. Findings only; never edits code.
review-code
Internal correctness + simplification review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks correctness, error handling, duplication, dead code, and simplification opportunities against the project's own conventions. Findings only; never edits…
review-debt
Internal tech-debt transform pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Transforms the synthesized findings table into explicit debt items, each with a re-trigger condition; it does not rescan the diff. Findings only; never edits code.