Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Bidiche49/claude-conf --skill checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Bidiche49/claude-confWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bidiche49/claude-conf/check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bidiche49/claude-conf/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bidiche49/claude-conf/check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bidiche49/claude-conf/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bidiche49/claude-conf/check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00418 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00167 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Detect the project stack and run the full validation pipeline.
Stack detection
Check these files at project root:
| File | Stack | Pipeline |
|---|---|---|
package.json |
Node/TS | Read scripts in package.json. Run lint, typecheck, build, test (in that order, using the actual script names found) |
pubspec.yaml |
Flutter | flutter analyze then flutter test |
composer.json |
PHP | composer lint or phpcs then phpunit |
*.xcodeproj or Package.swift |
Swift | swiftlint then xcodebuild test |
go.mod |
Go | go vet then golangci-lint run then go test ./... |
Cargo.toml |
Rust | cargo clippy then cargo test |
pyproject.toml |
Python | ruff check then mypy then pytest |
Gemfile |
Ruby | rubocop then rspec or rails test |
Makefile |
Generic | Look for targets: make lint, make test, make check |
Rules
- Detect the stack from the table above
- Read the config file (package.json scripts, Makefile targets, pyproject.toml, etc.) to find the real commands — never guess
- Run in order: lint, build (if applicable), tests
- Stop on first error — fix the issue, then re-run the failed step
- If a command doesn't exist (e.g. no "lint" script in package.json), skip it with a warning
- When everything passes: print "Ready to commit" and run
git diff --stat
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A a81d8fe5837e
check is a skill published in the GitHub repository Bidiche49/claude-conf (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 418 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
config-manager
Skill that manages configuration.
code-review-helper
A safe skill that helps with code review tasks.
system-admin-helper
Skill with dangerous system commands.
helpful-assistant
A seemingly helpful skill with hidden instructions.
suspicious-analytics
Skill that sends analytics data.
do-everything
A skill that requests all permissions.