Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/florianbruniaux/claude-code-plugins/review-prnpx skills add FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-plugins --skill review-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/florianbruniaux/claude-code-plugins/review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/florianbruniaux/claude-code-plugins/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/florianbruniaux/claude-code-plugins/review-pr.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00012 | $0.02136 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01068 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00427 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00214 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 300 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Pull Request
Perform a comprehensive code review of a pull request.
Instructions
- Get PR information:
gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --json title,body,files,additions,deletions - Review each changed file
- Provide structured feedback
Review Checklist
Code Quality
- Code is readable and well-organized
- Functions are appropriately sized
- No code duplication
- Meaningful variable/function names
Functionality
- Logic is correct
- Edge cases handled
- Error handling is comprehensive
- No obvious bugs
Security
- No hardcoded secrets
- Input validation present
- No injection vulnerabilities
- Authorization checks in place
Testing
- Tests added for new code
- Existing tests still pass
- Edge cases tested
Documentation
- Code is self-documenting or commented
- README updated if needed
- API changes documented
Output Format
## PR Review: #[number] - [title]
### Summary
[1-2 sentence overview]
### Approval Status
[ ] Approved
[ ] Approved with suggestions
[ ] Changes requested
### Findings
#### Critical (Must Fix)
- [ ] [Issue description] - `file:line`
#### Suggestions (Should Consider)
- [ ] [Improvement] - `file:line`
#### Nitpicks (Optional)
- [ ] [Minor suggestion] - `file:line`
### Positive Highlights
- [What's done well]
### Questions
- [Clarifications needed]
Usage
/review-pr 123
/review-pr https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123
Advanced: Multi-Agent Review
For production-grade reviews requiring specialized perspectives and anti-hallucination safeguards.
Pre-flight Check
Before reviewing, check if this is a follow-up pass to avoid repeating suggestions:
# Detect if Claude already reviewed this PR
git log --oneline -10 | grep "Co-Authored-By: Claude"
If detected, note: "This appears to be a follow-up pass. I'll focus on new issues and avoid repeating previous suggestions."
Scope Drift Detection
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 300 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A cd43592538d5
review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-plugins (40 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 2,136 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
vc-autopilot
Emit and validate the provisional goal block for Autopilot Mode. Owns the 9-field format and resume detection from a pasted goal block.
vc-problem-solving
Apply systematic problem-solving techniques when stuck. Use for complexity spirals, innovation blocks, recurring patterns, assumption constraints, simplification cascades, scale uncertainty.
thoroughness-scoring
Score every decision point with a Thoroughness Rating (1-10). AI makes the marginal cost of doing things properly near-zero — pick the higher-rated option every time. Includes scope checks to distinguish contained vs unbounded work.
report
Read the delivery log and say which rules actually fire, which never have, and what to prune or fix. Use when the user asks whether ballast is doing anything, wants to clean up their rule catalog, or on a periodic review.
orchestrate
Wire Commands, Agents, and Skills together for complex features. Use when building features that need research, planning, and implementation phases.
squid-self-improve
Analyze developer corrections from the current coding session and persist lessons learned as rules in AGENTS.md files or memory. Use at the end of a session after the developer corrected your work, when they say "squid-self-improve", ask to capture what was learned, or ask you to reflect on mistakes and extract…