Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills --skill connerkward__lookdev-studio-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills/connerkward__lookdev-studio-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills/connerkward__lookdev-studio-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills/connerkward__lookdev-studio-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills/connerkward__lookdev-studio-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills/connerkward__lookdev-studio-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 162 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00115 | $0.07513 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00057 | $0.03757 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01503 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00751 |
Grade A, and why
lookdev scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- lookdev — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 199 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Lookdev
When the user says "lookdev" — or any of: tune, dial in, iterate on the look of, compare variations of, let me adjust, let me edit/annotate/mark up, review this post/doc/copy — they mean build an interactive in-browser tool the user directly manipulates. Not a static grid of N variations. Not a Q&A where they specify numbers. Not a wall of prose they're asked to read and reply to in chat. A real-time studio where they act on the artifact and the change is captured.
Two studio shapes — pick by what's being tuned:
- Visual-parameter lookdev — the artifact's look is set by numbers/choices (color, type, layout, image treatment, animation, 3D). Controls = sliders, pickers, drag handles. This is the bulk of this skill (below).
- Text & media lookdev — the artifact is a document, blog post, copy, or media set and the user is editing/curating it: rewriting sentences, cutting boring paragraphs, highlighting, leaving margin comments, flagging "diagram goes here" / "wrong image, replace." Controls = direct inline editing + selection highlight + anchored comments + media annotation. See the dedicated section below. A blog post / doc / script review IS this mode — never hand back a long markdown file and ask the user to react in chat. Stand up the annotation studio.
What it covers
Any visual decision the user picks by feel, not by spec. Expand this list as needed:
- Image processing — dither, halftone, posterize, ASCII, blur, edge, quantize, mosaic, color-grade
- Color — palette extraction (show coverage %), per-band pickers, saturation / contrast / gamma curves, harmony presets, theme tokens
- Typography — font selector, size / weight / leading / tracking / measure, live sample text, fallback stack
- Layout, positioning, framing, spacing — draggable & selectable elements; resize handles; margin / padding rulers; alignment guides; snap-to-grid; aspect-lock toggles
- Crop & framing — draggable crop rectangle with aspect lock; live cropped preview at production size
- Animation / transitions — easing curve editor, duration sliders, scrubber, replay
- Component variants — render hover / focus / disabled / loading / dark side by side on one page
- Iconography — stroke weight, corner radius, glyph on canvas
- AI-generated content — prompt input + param sliders + side-by-side regeneration grid
- Anything else where "show me, I'll pick" beats "ask me to specify a number"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 199 lines · 115 tokens per session scan A 61e76aa19b4a
lookdev is a skill published in the GitHub repository Bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills (4 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 115 tokens to every session and 7,513 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
serpsmith
Publish SEO articles reliably across AI-agent runtimes.
archify
Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and…
ux-design
Create comprehensive UX design with user flows, wireframes, and design systems.
accessibility-a11y
Semantic HTML, keyboard navigation, focus states, ARIA labels, skip links, and WCAG contrast requirements. Use when ensuring accessibility compliance, implementing keyboard navigation, or adding screen reader support.
tailwind-shadcn
Tailwind CSS utility patterns with shadcn/ui component usage, theming via CSS variables, and responsive design. Use when styling components, installing shadcn components, implementing dark mode, or creating consistent design systems.
web-artifacts-builder-v2
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artefacts using modern frontend web technologies (React 19, Tailwind CSS v4, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artefacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artefacts.