Getting it into your agent
There is no command for this one: it runs only inside a plugin, and the catalogue could not identify which plugin ships it. The source is linked below.
Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/biraj2004/huashu-skills-english/huashu-proofreading-en)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/biraj2004/huashu-skills-english/huashu-proofreading-en"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/biraj2004/huashu-skills-english/huashu-proofreading-en/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/biraj2004/huashu-skills-english/huashu-proofreading-en"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/biraj2004/huashu-skills-english/huashu-proofreading-en.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.02900 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01450 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00580 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00290 |
Grade A, and why
huashu-proofreading scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 347 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI-Taste Proofreading
A systematic, three-pass professional proofreading capability to reduce an article's AI detection rate and add a human touch.
When to Use This Skill
This skill is automatically loaded when:
- The user says "proofread this", "reduce the AI feel", or "too AI-sounding"
- After a first draft is completed
- The user mentions "high AI detection rate" or "lacks personality"
- The article needs a final polish
Core Objectives
- Reduce AI detection rate: Target below 30%
- Add human touch: Give the article an experiential feel, warmth, and the sense of a real person speaking
- Maintain Huashu's style: Practice-oriented, technically substantive, accessible, and actionable
Three-Pass Proofreading Workflow
Pass 1: Content Review (Logic, Facts, Structure)
Objective: Ensure content is accurate and logic is clear
Checklist:
- Facts accurate? (data, dates, product names)
- Logic clear? (no contradictions)
- Structure sound? (no off-topic content)
- Information complete? (all key points covered)
- No fabrications? (all data and cases are real)
Method:
- Read from start to finish, flag any questionable points
- Search to verify uncertain information
- Check accuracy of numbers and proper nouns
Pass 2: Style Review (Reducing AI Tone)
Objective: Remove the AI feel and add human character
Core check: 6 categories of AI-sounding language
1️⃣ Filler Phrases
❌ AI often says:
- "In today's era", "Against the backdrop of..."
- "In summary", "To sum up"
- "It is worth noting", "It should be emphasised"
- "With the development of...", "Alongside..."
✅ Rewrite direction: Cut straight to the point; no circling around
Example:
❌ "In the era of rapid AI technological development, the programming tools landscape is also evolving..."
✅ "Claude Code is out. I've used it for two weeks — it's genuinely better than Cursor."
2️⃣ AI Sentence Patterns (Repeated Templates)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 347 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 9b7c5a635021
huashu-proofreading is a skill published in the GitHub repository Biraj2004/huashu-skills-english (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 2,900 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
offensive-crypto-attacks
Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…
offensive-c2-frameworks
Command and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across…
offensive-parameter-pollution
HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.
offensive-wifi
Wireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons…
offensive-z-wave
Z-Wave attack methodology — sniffing with Z-Force / EZ-Wave / RTL-SDR + ZniffMobile, S0 (legacy) network-key derivation flaw and key reuse, S2 (modern) ECDH commissioning analysis, replay/injection on unauthenticated nodes, default-key brute-force on test deployments, and home-automation hub pivots. Use when targeting…
seo
Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when asked to "improve SEO", "optimize for search", "fix meta tags", "add structured data", "sitemap optimization", or "search engine optimization".